State of Tennessee v. Tamela Scott - Concurring/Dissenting
This text of State of Tennessee v. Tamela Scott - Concurring/Dissenting (State of Tennessee v. Tamela Scott - Concurring/Dissenting) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE October 24, 2007 Session
STATE OF TENNESSEE v. TAMELA T. SCOTT
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Cannon County No. F05-02 Don Ash, Judge
No. M2006-02067-CCA-R3-CD - Filed September 17, 2008
ROBERT W. WEDEMEYER , J., concurring in part and dissenting in part.
I concur in the well-reasoned opinion of the majority as to all issues except the issue of the Defendant’s sentence. The majority opinion modifies the Defendant’s sentence from one year of confinement followed by sixteen years of probation to one year of confinement followed by eight years of probation.
As the majority opinion points out, “the trial court related the sixteen-year term of probation to the need to ensure that the Defendant complied with the professions of rehabilitating herself that she made in her allocution.” In my view, this finding by the trial court is supported by the record and relevant sentencing principles and should not be disturbed on appeal. State v. Fletcher, 805 S.W.2d 785, 789 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1991).
I would affirm the sentence imposed by the trial court.
________________________________ ROBERT W. WEDEMEYER, JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State of Tennessee v. Tamela Scott - Concurring/Dissenting, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-tennessee-v-tamela-scott-concurringdissen-tenncrimapp-2008.