State of Tennessee v. Stacey Philander Baldon-Concurring

• Court: Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee
• Decided: October 23, 2015
• Docket: W2015-00821-CCA-R3-CD
• Status: Published

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs September 1, 2015

STATE OF TENNESSEE v. STACEY PHILANDER BALDON

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lauderdale County No. 5205, 6755 Joe H. Walker, III, Judge

No. W2015-00821-CCA-R3-CD - Filed October 23, 2015 _____________________________

Timothy L. Easter, J., concurring.

I concur with the results of the majority, but from a somewhat different view. I agree the arrival of Rule 36.1 has produced an anathema. I further agree that the trial court misapprehended Defendant’s claim as one that would result in permissive sentence alignment.

I differ from the majority on Defendant’s 1999 cocaine possession conviction. If Defendant’s claims regarding his widespread criminal sentences are to be taken in the light most favorable to him, his claim produces the off-beat result of unexpired sentences1 and we are obliged to allow him an amended Judgment to reflect that which he deserves and claims to crave—an automatic consecutive twelve-year sentence for the 1999 jury verdict conviction. Nothing about Defendant’s claim would allow for a re-sentencing or retrial of this conviction. The weapons plea poses a different inquiry and further proceedings may be needed to test the material component question for that sentence only.

_______________________________ TIMOTHY L. EASTER, JUDGE

1 Defendant received a ten-year sentence in 1989. According to Defendant, he only served three years before being paroled in 1992, leaving seven years left to be served. He received a twelve-year sentence in 1999, thus rendering a consecutive sentence of nineteen years which will not expire until the year 2018.