State of Tennessee v. Michael Woods - Concurring
This text of State of Tennessee v. Michael Woods - Concurring (State of Tennessee v. Michael Woods - Concurring) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs October 5, 2004
STATE OF TENNESSEE v. MICHAEL WOODS
Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. 99-09509 W. Fred Axley, Judge
No. W2003-02762-CCA-R3-CD - Filed February 17, 2005
JOSEPH M. TIPTON , J., concurring.
I concur in the results reached and most of the reasoning used in the majority opinion. I disagree, though, with the conclusion that Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. ____, 124 S. Ct. 2531 (2004), does not affect the sentencing. However, I believe the defendant’s history of criminal of convictions justifies the sentence he received.
____________________________________ JOSEPH M. TIPTON, JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State of Tennessee v. Michael Woods - Concurring, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-tennessee-v-michael-woods-concurring-tenncrimapp-2005.