State of Tennessee v. Linda Gail Philpot - Concurring and Dissenting

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee

State of Tennessee v. Linda Gail Philpot - Concurring and Dissenting

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee

DecidedMay 2, 2001

DocketM2000-01999-CCA-R3-CD

StatusPublished

This text of State of Tennessee v. Linda Gail Philpot - Concurring and Dissenting (State of Tennessee v. Linda Gail Philpot - Concurring and Dissenting) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State of Tennessee v. Linda Gail Philpot - Concurring and Dissenting, (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs March 14, 2001

STATE OF TENNESSEE v. LINDA GAIL PHILPOTT

Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Bedford County NO . 14623

NO . M2000-01999-CCA-R3-CD - FILED MAY 2, 2001

James Curwood Witt, Jr., J., concurring and dissenting.

I concur that a sentencing alternative of split confinement should be utilized in the present case; however, I respectfully disagree that confinement for 35 days is appropriate. A consecutive sentence of 20 days confinement for each count would be more in line with the sentence approved by this court in the remarkably similar case of State v. Cynthia D. Stacey, No. 03C01-9803-CC- 00091 (Tenn. Crim. App., Knoxville, May 24, 1999) (approving 180 days of confinement followed by two years of community corrections, for defendant who, as a home health care worker, stole money from an elderly couple in her care). The cases are very similar, and in light of Cynthia D. Stacey, the present case, on its own facts, suggests a more punitive, deterrent sentence than 35 days in confinement. Thus, I would extend the confinement portion of the sentence to an aggregate of 140 days.

___________________________________ James Curwood Witt, Jr., Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs March 14, 2001

STATE OF TENNESSEE v. LINDA GAIL PHILPOTT

Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Bedford County NO . 14623

NO . M2000-01999-CCA-R3-CD - FILED MAY 2, 2001

James Curwood Witt, Jr., J., concurring and dissenting.

I concur that a sentencing alternative of split confinement should be utilized in the present case; however, I respectfully disagree that confinement for 35 days is appropriate. A consecutive sentence of 20 days confinement for each count would be more in line with the sentence approved by this court in the remarkably similar case of State v. Cynthia D. Stacey, No. 03C01-9803-CC- 00091 (Tenn. Crim. App., Knoxville, May 24, 1999) (approving 180 days of confinement followed by two years of community corrections, for defendant who, as a home health care worker, stole money from an elderly couple in her care). The cases are very similar, and in light of Cynthia D. Stacey, the present case, on its own facts, suggests a more punitive, deterrent sentence than 35 days in confinement. Thus, I would extend the confinement portion of the sentence to an aggregate of 140 days.

___________________________________ James Curwood Witt, Jr., Judge

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

State of Tennessee v. Linda Gail Philpot - Concurring and Dissenting, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-tennessee-v-linda-gail-philpot-concurring-tenncrimapp-2001.