State of Tennessee v. Kenneth Lebron Wynn - dissenting

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee

State of Tennessee v. Kenneth Lebron Wynn - dissenting

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee

DecidedOctober 14, 2015

DocketE2015-00575-CCA-R3-CD

StatusPublished

This text of State of Tennessee v. Kenneth Lebron Wynn - dissenting (State of Tennessee v. Kenneth Lebron Wynn - dissenting) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State of Tennessee v. Kenneth Lebron Wynn - dissenting, (Tenn. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs August 19, 2015

STATE OF TENNESSEE v. KENNETH L. WYNN Appeal from the Criminal Court for Hamilton County Nos. 188918, 189686-189688 Don W. Poole, Judge

No. E2015-00575-CCA-R3-CD – Filed October 14, 2015

JAMES CURWOOD WITT, JR., J., dissenting.

Viewing the defendant‟s motion in the light most favorable to the movant, as we are obliged to do, see State v. David Morrow, No. W2014-00338-CCA-R3-CO, slip op. at 3-4 (Tenn. Crim. App., Jackson, Aug. 13, 2014); see also Tenn. Sup. Ct. R. 28 § 2(H), we should accede to the State‟s concession that a fair reading of the claim indicates that it bespeaks an illegal sentence.

Furthermore, Rule 36.1 contains no provision disqualifying a movant on the ground that the challenged sentence has expired. Indeed, to the contrary, “Rule 36.1 states that a defendant „may, at any time, seek the correction of an illegal sentence by filing a motion to correct an illegal sentence in the trial court in which the judgment of conviction was entered.‟” State v. Sean Blake, No. W2014-00856-CCA-R3-CO, slip op. at 3 (Tenn. Crim. App., Jackson, Jan. 8, 2015) (quoting Tenn. R. Crim. P. 36.1(a)).

Because I respectfully differ from the majority on these points, I would reverse and remand the case for a hearing.

JAMES CURWOOD WITT, JR., JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs August 19, 2015

STATE OF TENNESSEE v. KENNETH L. WYNN Appeal from the Criminal Court for Hamilton County Nos. 188918, 189686-189688 Don W. Poole, Judge

No. E2015-00575-CCA-R3-CD – Filed October 14, 2015

JAMES CURWOOD WITT, JR., J., dissenting.

Viewing the defendant‟s motion in the light most favorable to the movant, as we are obliged to do, see State v. David Morrow, No. W2014-00338-CCA-R3-CO, slip op. at 3-4 (Tenn. Crim. App., Jackson, Aug. 13, 2014); see also Tenn. Sup. Ct. R. 28 § 2(H), we should accede to the State‟s concession that a fair reading of the claim indicates that it bespeaks an illegal sentence.

Furthermore, Rule 36.1 contains no provision disqualifying a movant on the ground that the challenged sentence has expired. Indeed, to the contrary, “Rule 36.1 states that a defendant „may, at any time, seek the correction of an illegal sentence by filing a motion to correct an illegal sentence in the trial court in which the judgment of conviction was entered.‟” State v. Sean Blake, No. W2014-00856-CCA-R3-CO, slip op. at 3 (Tenn. Crim. App., Jackson, Jan. 8, 2015) (quoting Tenn. R. Crim. P. 36.1(a)).

Because I respectfully differ from the majority on these points, I would reverse and remand the case for a hearing.

JAMES CURWOOD WITT, JR., JUDGE

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

State of Tennessee v. Kenneth Lebron Wynn - dissenting, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-tennessee-v-kenneth-lebron-wynn-dissentin-tenncrimapp-2015.