State of Tennessee v. Jimmy R. Griffin-Concurring In Part, Dissenting In Part

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee·Decided May 20, 2014·No. W2013-01774-CCA-R3-CD·Published

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs March 05, 2014

STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JIMMY GRIFFIN, JR.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Madison County No. 1323 Donald H. Allen, Judge

No. W2013-01774-CCA-R3-CD - Filed May 20, 2014

T HOMAS T. W OODALL, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part.

I respectfully dissent from that portion of the majority opinion which sets aside the order of restitution and remands for another hearing. I disagree that this is an appropriate case to observe “plain error” and would accordingly affirm the judgment of the trial court.

___________________________________ THOMAS T. WOODALL, JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State of Tennessee v. Jimmy R. Griffin-Concurring In Part, Dissenting In Part, (Tenn. Ct. App. 2014).

State of Tennessee v. Jimmy R. Griffin-Concurring In Part, Dissenting In Part (State of Tennessee v. Jimmy R. Griffin-Concurring In Part, Dissenting In Part) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.