State of Tennessee v. Jimmy R. Griffin-Concurring In Part, Dissenting In Part
This text of State of Tennessee v. Jimmy R. Griffin-Concurring In Part, Dissenting In Part (State of Tennessee v. Jimmy R. Griffin-Concurring In Part, Dissenting In Part) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs March 05, 2014
STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JIMMY GRIFFIN, JR.
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Madison County No. 1323 Donald H. Allen, Judge
No. W2013-01774-CCA-R3-CD - Filed May 20, 2014
T HOMAS T. W OODALL, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part.
I respectfully dissent from that portion of the majority opinion which sets aside the order of restitution and remands for another hearing. I disagree that this is an appropriate case to observe “plain error” and would accordingly affirm the judgment of the trial court.
___________________________________ THOMAS T. WOODALL, JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State of Tennessee v. Jimmy R. Griffin-Concurring In Part, Dissenting In Part, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-tennessee-v-jimmy-r-griffin-concurring-in-tenncrimapp-2014.