State of Tennessee v. Jeremy Sims and Sherry Brookshire-Concurring
This text of State of Tennessee v. Jeremy Sims and Sherry Brookshire-Concurring (State of Tennessee v. Jeremy Sims and Sherry Brookshire-Concurring) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON April 14, 2015 Session
STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JEREMY SIMS and SHERRY BROOKSHIRE
Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. 1106350 James C. Beasley, Jr., Judge
No. W2013-01253-CCA-R3-CD - Filed September 25, 2015 _____________________________
THOMAS T. WOODALL, P.J., concurring in results only.
I respectfully concur in results only. I do so because the majority opinion, in the section discussing Defendant Sims’ severance issue, fails to address the admissibility of Defendant Sims’ unredacted statement pursuant to the “rule of completeness.” Tenn. R. Evid. 106. As noted in the majority opinion, the trial court considered the rule of completeness in its decision to admit the evidence. The majority opinion, in my view, implies that Defendant Sims’ unredacted statement was inadmissible under any circumstances in this particular case.
________________________________________ THOMAS T. WOODALL, PRESIDING JUDGE
1
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State of Tennessee v. Jeremy Sims and Sherry Brookshire-Concurring, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-tennessee-v-jeremy-sims-and-sherry-brooks-tenncrimapp-2015.