State of Tennessee v. Daniel Thomason - Order
This text of State of Tennessee v. Daniel Thomason - Order (State of Tennessee v. Daniel Thomason - Order) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE
STATE OF TENNESSEE v. DANIEL THOMASON
Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 99-B-1387
No. M2000-01164-CCA-R3-CD - Filed November 27, 2001
ORDER
This matter is before us on the court’s own motion to correct errors associated with entries of an order on rehearing, opinion and judgment on October 15, 2001. A brief procedural history is in order to understand the basis for the court’s action in the instant order. On July 11, 2001, this court entered an opinion and judgment in this case. The defendant thereafter moved for rehearing, and we granted his motion on August 14, 2001. On October 15, 2001, we entered an order which addressed the merits of the defendant’s rehearing issue. That order also contained the following language, “The judgment previously entered is WITHDRAWN and is RE-ENTERED as of the entry of this order.” (Emphasis in original.) Although that order directed the withdrawal and reentry of the judgment, both the opinion and the judgment of July 11 were withdrawn and reentered on that date. The withdrawal and reentry of the opinion was in error. Moreover, that erroneous action prompted the accrual of additional costs.
The court finds that good cause exists to correct the erroneous reentry of the opinion on October 15, 2001 and to waive the costs associated with the error and its correction. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the opinion of October 15, 2001 is hereby VACATED and shall be REENTERED nunc pro tunc July 11, 2001. It is further ORDERED that the costs associated with the erroneous withdrawal and reentry of the opinion on October 15, 2001, the costs associated with the withdrawal and reentry of the opinion on the date of the instant order, and any other costs associated with the instant order are WAIVED.
PER CURIAM
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State of Tennessee v. Daniel Thomason - Order, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-tennessee-v-daniel-thomason-order-tenncrimapp-2001.