State of Tennessee v. Cleander Cleon Hartman, Jr. - Concurring and Dissenting
This text of State of Tennessee v. Cleander Cleon Hartman, Jr. - Concurring and Dissenting (State of Tennessee v. Cleander Cleon Hartman, Jr. - Concurring and Dissenting) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE May 15, 2001 Session
STATE OF TENNESSEE v. CLEANDER CLEON HARTMAN, JR.
Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Williamson County No. II-599-154 Timothy L. Easter, Judge
No. M200-02441-CCA-R3-CD - Filed January 17, 2002
NORMA MCGEE OGLE , J., concurring in part and dissenting in part.
I fully concur in the majority’s opinion with the exception of its conclusion that the sentence in this case is unreasonable in light of the severity of the offenses. In any event, upon remand for a new trial, should the defendant again be convicted pursuant to counts one and three of the indictment, the trial court should be free to consider the imposition of consecutive sentencing in light of any additional evidence presented by the State.
___________________________________ NORMA McGEE OGLE, JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State of Tennessee v. Cleander Cleon Hartman, Jr. - Concurring and Dissenting, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-tennessee-v-cleander-cleon-hartman-jr-con-tenncrimapp-2002.