State of Tennessee v. Christopher Shane Poole - Concurring
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE
Assigned on Briefs April 22, 2008
STATE OF TENNESSEE v. CHRISTOPHER SHANE POOLE
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dickson County No. CR8729 Robert E. Burch, Judge
No. M2007-01041-CCA-R3-CD - Filed May 29, 2008
JAMES CURWOOD WITT , JR., J., concurring.
I fully concur in the excellent majority opinion. I would simply add that Tennessee commercial law supports the majority’s conclusion that the payor bank held a valid claim against the defendant. Generally, “an unauthorized signature is ineffective except as the signature of the unauthorized signer in favor of a person who in good faith pays the instrument or takes it for value.” T.C.A § 47-3-403(a) (2001).
JAMES CURWOOD WITT, JR., JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State of Tennessee v. Christopher Shane Poole - Concurring (State of Tennessee v. Christopher Shane Poole - Concurring) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.