State of Tennessee v. Chris Ramey - Concurring
This text of State of Tennessee v. Chris Ramey - Concurring (State of Tennessee v. Chris Ramey - Concurring) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE
AT KNOXVILLE FILED MARCH 1996 SESSION July 9, 1996
Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate C ourt Clerk STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) ) Appellee, ) No. 03C01-9509-CC-00285 ) ) Sevier County v. ) ) Hon. Rex Henry Ogle, Judge ) CHRIS RAMEY, ) (Pretrial Diversion Denial) ) Appellant. )
CONCURRING OPINION
I agree that the trial court's judgment should be affirmed. I join in Judge
Tipton's concurring opinion because I believe that this record is adequate for our
full appellate review. I am of the opinion that the procedures outlined in State v.
Winsett, 882 S.W.2d 806 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1993) have been followed.
_____________________________ PAUL G. SUMMERS, Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State of Tennessee v. Chris Ramey - Concurring, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-tennessee-v-chris-ramey-concurring-tennctapp-1996.