State of Tennessee v. Charles Chesteen - Concur

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee·Decided June 8, 2000·No. E1999-00910-CCA-R3-CD·Published

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE

STATE OF TENNESSEE v. CHARLES CHESTEEN

Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Cocke County No. 7221, 7222 Kindall T. Lawson, Judge

No. E1999-00910-CCA-R3-CD - Decided June 8, 2000

JUDGE TIPTON concurring.

I concur in the results reached and most of the reasoning used in the majority opinion. However, I respectfully disagree with its conclusion that the minor victims were particularly vulnerable because of their age as contemplated by Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-114(4). In my opinion, the fact that the defendant, as clerk and master, had control over the minors’ funds because they were minors rendered them no more vulnerable than any other litigant or party whose funds had been paid into court or otherwise put within the control of the clerk and master. I would not apply enhancement factor (4) to the offense of embezzlement in an official capacity.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State of Tennessee v. Charles Chesteen - Concur, (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000).

State of Tennessee v. Charles Chesteen - Concur (State of Tennessee v. Charles Chesteen - Concur) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 40-35-114
Tennessee § 40-35-114(4)