State of Tennessee v. Anthony Riggs - Concurring
This text of State of Tennessee v. Anthony Riggs - Concurring (State of Tennessee v. Anthony Riggs - Concurring) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE On Remand from the Tennessee Supreme Court
STATE OF TENNESSEE v. ANTHONY RIGGS
Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Wayne County No. 13,665 Stella Hargrove, Judge
No. M2007-02322-RM-CD - Filed May 7, 2008
JAMES CURWOOD WITT , JR., J., concurring.
I concur in the majority opinion except I would have not relied upon the presentence report for a Blakely-type admission. See State v. Charles Vantilburg III, No. W2006-02475-CCA-R3-CD (Tenn. Crim. App., at Jackson, Feb. 12, 2008) (holding that statements “made outside the confines of any judicial proceeding . . . do not qualify as admissions for purposes of the Sixth Amendment”).
___________________________________ JAMES CURWOOD WITT, JR., JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State of Tennessee v. Anthony Riggs - Concurring, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-tennessee-v-anthony-riggs-concurring-tenncrimapp-2008.