State of Tennessee v. Alorra D. Puckett - Dissenting
This text of State of Tennessee v. Alorra D. Puckett - Dissenting (State of Tennessee v. Alorra D. Puckett - Dissenting) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs May 21, 2003
STATE OF TENNESSEE v. ALORRA D. PUCKETT
Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Hamilton County No. 238682 Douglas A. Meyer, Judge
No. E2002-01959-CCA-R3-CD July 9, 2003
JOE G. RILEY, J., dissenting.
Although the issue is indeed close, I believe the stop was lawful. The officer observed three driving irregularities on a straight highway within a relatively short period of time, one of which occurred prior to activation of the videotape. Thus, I believe the facts here are distinguishable from the cases relied upon by the majority and are more similar to State v. Gary S. Greve, No. E2002- 00999-CCA-R3-CD, 2003 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 255 (Tenn. Crim. App. Mar. 27, 2003, at Knoxville), in which we upheld the stop.
JOE G. RILEY, JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State of Tennessee v. Alorra D. Puckett - Dissenting, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-tennessee-v-alorra-d-puckett-dissenting-tenncrimapp-2003.