State of Oregon v. D. H.

323 P.3d 994, 262 Or. App. 325, 2014 WL 1499794, 2014 Ore. App. LEXIS 542
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedApril 16, 2014
Docket131070632; A155523
StatusPublished

This text of 323 P.3d 994 (State of Oregon v. D. H.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State of Oregon v. D. H., 323 P.3d 994, 262 Or. App. 325, 2014 WL 1499794, 2014 Ore. App. LEXIS 542 (Or. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing her for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. She contends that the trial court erred in concluding that, as a result of a mental disorder, she is a danger to herself. See ORS 426.005(l)(e). The state concedes that the record does not contain legally sufficient evidence to support the involuntary commitment and that the trial court’s judgment should be reversed. We agree and accept the state’s concession.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 426.130
Oregon § 426.130
§ 426.005
Oregon § 426.005

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
323 P.3d 994, 262 Or. App. 325, 2014 WL 1499794, 2014 Ore. App. LEXIS 542, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-oregon-v-d-h-orctapp-2014.