State of Oklahoma v. State of Texas, United States, Intervener

268 U.S. 472, 45 S. Ct. 609, 69 L. Ed. 1057, 1925 U.S. LEXIS 587
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided June 1, 1925·No. 13, Original·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

On’consideration of the final report of the receiver, presented a week ago, it is ordered that the accounts, disbursements and transactions of the receiver shown in the report be approved.

And it appearing that all of the property and moneys which came into the possession of the receiver have been disposed of, disbursed and paid out in compliance with the instructions and orders of the Court; that all of the expenses of the receivership have been paid; that the receiver has stored the books of account, records and files of the receivership with the Security Storage Company of Washington, D. C., and has delivered the same as stored to the clerk of the Court, as directed in the order *473 of May 11, last'; and that the receivership ha$ served its purpose and is, now ready to be. closed:

It is considered, ordered and decreed that the receivership in this cause be, and it, now is, déclared at an end;, and that the receiver be, and he now is, relieved-and discharged from further duty, obligation and responsibility in .the premises.

In terminating the receivership the Court expresses its high appreciation of the admirable service of the receiver in satisfactorily managing a large estate in novel and difficult circumstances.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State of Oklahoma v. State of Texas, United States, Intervener, 268 U.S. 472, 45 S. Ct. 609, 69 L. Ed. 1057, 1925 U.S. LEXIS 587 (1925).

268 U.S. 472 (State of Oklahoma v. State of Texas, United States, Intervener) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

California State Board of Equalization v. Goggin
191 F.2d 726 (Ninth Circuit, 1951)
State of Texas v. Balli
190 S.W.2d 71 (Texas Supreme Court, 1944)
Kootz v. Tax Commission
280 N.W. 672 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1938)