STATE OF OKLAHOMA ex rel OBA v. CONRADY

2025 OK 50
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedJuly 30, 2025
DocketSCBD-7863
StatusPublished

This text of 2025 OK 50 (STATE OF OKLAHOMA ex rel OBA v. CONRADY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
STATE OF OKLAHOMA ex rel OBA v. CONRADY, 2025 OK 50 (Okla. 2025).

Opinion

OSCN Found Document:STATE OF OKLAHOMA ex rel OBA v. CONRADY
  1. Previous Case
  2. Top Of Index
  3. This Point in Index
  4. Citationize
  5. Next Case
  6. Print Only

STATE OF OKLAHOMA ex rel OBA v. CONRADY
2025 OK 50
Case Number: SCBD-7863
Decided: 07/30/2025
THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA


Cite as: 2025 OK 50, __ P.3d __

FOR PUBLICATION IN OBJ ONLY. NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.



State of Oklahoma ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Association, Complainant
v.
James Albert Conrady, Respondent

ORDER OF IMMEDIATE INTERIM SUSPENSION

¶1 Complainant, the Oklahoma Bar Association (OBA), filed a verified complaint against Respondent, James Albert Conrady, pursuant to Rule 6 of the Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings (RGDP) 5 O.S.2011, ch. 1, app. 1-A. With the concurrence of the Professional Responsibility Commission, the OBA, requests an emergency interim suspension and related relief to prohibit Respondent from withdrawing funds from his IOLTA account until a complete audit may be performed, pursuant to Rule 6.2A of the RGDP.

¶2 The OBA submits Respondent's conduct poses an immediate threat of substantial and irreparable public harm to the public and warrants imposition of an emergency interim suspension. In addition to interim suspension, the OBA requests the Court issue an order prohibiting Respondent from withdrawing funds from his IOLTA account until an audit may be performed.

¶3 This Court ordered Respondent to show cause why an immediate interim suspension should not be entered and the related relief should not be granted. Respondent did not respond.

¶4 Upon consideration of the application for immediate interim suspension, the Court finds that Respondent's conduct poses an immediate threat of substantial and irreparable public harm, namely harm to his clients' legal and financial interests.

¶5 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Respondent, James Albert Conrady, is immediately suspended from the practice of law, pursuant to Rule 6.2A of the RGDP.

¶DONE BY ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT on July 30, 2025.

                                                                                                                                                      ________________________________
                                                                                                                                                      /S/ ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE

The Oklahoma Supreme Court
2100 N. Lincoln Blvd., Suite 1
Oklahoma City, OK 73105

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2025 OK 50, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-oklahoma-ex-rel-oba-v-conrady-okla-2025.