State of Ohio Ex Rel. Fulton v. Saal
191 N.E. 516, 264 N.Y. 465, 1934 N.Y. LEXIS 1517
Opinion
Motion denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements, on the ground that there has been no final determination of any action or special proceeding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State of Ohio Ex Rel. Fulton v. Saal, 191 N.E. 516, 264 N.Y. 465, 1934 N.Y. LEXIS 1517 (N.Y. 1934).
191 N.E. 516 (State of Ohio Ex Rel. Fulton v. Saal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
G.C.S. Co. v. Aresco, Inc.
88 A.D.2d 611 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
G.C.S. Co. v. Aresco, Inc.
111 Misc. 2d 45 (New York Supreme Court, 1981)
Kelly v. Librik
45 Misc. 2d 883 (New York Supreme Court, 1965)