State of New York v. Mahaffy

12 A.2d 389, 22 Del. Ch. 405, 1936 Del. Ch. LEXIS 37
Supreme Court of Delaware·Decided November 10, 1936·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Rodney, J.,

delivering the opinion of the Court:

We are in entire accord with the opinion of the Chancellor, reported as Elsner v. United American Utilities, Inc., 21 Del. Ch. 73, 180 A. 589.

It would serve no useful purpose to here restate, in varying language, the reasoning or conclusion of the Chancellor. He considered every argument of the present appellant and cites every pertinent case.

The Chancellor held that, according to the decisions of the highest court of New York, the United American Utilities, Inc., was not “carrying on business” or “doing business” in the State of New York, and therefore no New York license fees or franchise taxes were payable. With this opinion we agree and on its reasoning and on the cases cited therein the decree is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State of New York v. Mahaffy, 12 A.2d 389, 22 Del. Ch. 405, 1936 Del. Ch. LEXIS 37 (Del. 1936).

12 A.2d 389 (State of New York v. Mahaffy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Silverman v. National Assets Corp.
12 A.2d 389 (Court of Chancery of Delaware, 1940)