STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. CARLOS COLON (84-09-2638, ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
This text of STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. CARLOS COLON (84-09-2638, ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. CARLOS COLON (84-09-2638, ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R. 1:36-3.
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4507-17T1
STATE OF NEW JERSEY,
Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
CARLOS COLON,
Defendant-Appellant. _____________________________
Submitted March 11, 2019 – Decided March 25, 2019
Before Judges Sabatino and Sumners.
On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Essex County, Indictment No. 84-09-2638.
Carlos Colon, appellant pro se.
Theodore N. Stephens II, Acting Essex County Prosecutor, attorney for respondent (Frank J. Ducoat, Special Deputy Attorney General/Acting Assistant Prosecutor, of counsel and on the brief).
PER CURIAM Defendant Carlos Colon, pro se, appeals the trial court's April 18, 2018
order denying his motion to correct an allegedly illegal sentence. We affirm.
In 1985, defendant unconditionally pled guilty to all three counts of an
indictment charging him with felony murder, N.J.S.A. 2C:11-3(a)(3), first-
degree robbery, N.J.S.A. 2C:15-1, and fourth-degree unlawful possession of a
weapon, N.J.S.A. 2C:39-5(d). The latter two counts merged at sentencing into
the felony murder count. The trial court imposed a life sentence with a thirty-
year period of parole ineligibility.
Defendant argues his sentence is illegal because New Jersey law allegedly
does not authorize the imposition of a life sentence with a thirty-year parole
disqualifier as a punishment for murder. Not so. N.J.S.A. 2C:11-3(b)(1) clearly
provides that, subject to certain exceptions not applicable here, a defendant
convicted of murder "shall be sentenced . . . to a term of 30 years, during which
the person shall not be eligible for parole, or be sentenced to a specific term of
years which shall be between 30 years and life imprisonment of which the person
shall serve 30 years before being eligible for parole." (Emphasis added). See
also State v. Scales, 231 N.J. Super. 336, 340 (App. Div. 1989) (holding that, as
the result of 1982 amendments to the Criminal Code, "three alternative sentences
for murder could be imposed: (1) death; (2) a sentence of 30 years without
A-4507-17T1 2 parole; and (3) a sentence between thirty years and life, with a 30-year term of
parole ineligibility.").
Defendant's sentence comports with these requirements. None of the
cases he cites in his brief support a contrary result. The "life" component of his
sentence is lawful and did not require a numeric designation of years. See Ibid.
(modifying a life sentence with a forty-year parole disqualifier to a life sentence
with a thirty-year parole disqualifier); see also State v. Carroll, 242 N.J. Super.
549, 566 (App. Div. 1990) (modifying a life sentence with a fifty-year parole
disqualifier to a life sentence with a thirty-year parole disqualifier); State v.
Thomas, 224 N.J. Super. 221, 230-31 (App. Div. 1988) (noting that the
imposition of a life sentence upon a defendant found guilty of murder is "beyond
challenge," but modifying the parole disqualifier to comport with N.J.S.A.
2C:11-3(b)).
Defendant's citation to State v. Townsend, 186 N.J. 473 (2006) is
unavailing because that case concerned an extended term for murder and
N.J.S.A. 2C:43-7 rather than, as here, an ordinary term for murder under
N.J.S.A. 2C:11-2. Id. at 485 n.2.
Defendant's separate argument claiming that he was not sufficiently
informed of the nature of the charges he was facing before entering his guilty
A-4507-17T1 3 plea more than thirty years ago was not raised below, could have been raised
long ago, and, for that matter, has not been shown to have any merit. R. 2:11-
3(e)(2).
Affirmed.
A-4507-17T1 4
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. CARLOS COLON (84-09-2638, ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-new-jersey-vs-carlos-colon-84-09-2638-essex-county-and-njsuperctappdiv-2019.