State of New Hampshire v. Richard Mooney
This text of State of New Hampshire v. Richard Mooney (State of New Hampshire v. Richard Mooney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
SUPREME COURT
In Case No. 2022-0207, State of New Hampshire v. Richard Mooney, the court on September 14, 2023, issued the following order:
The court has reviewed the written arguments and the record submitted on appeal, and has determined to resolve the case by way of this order. See Sup. Ct. R. 20(2). The defendant, Richard Mooney, appeals an order of the Superior Court (Kissinger, J.), issued following a hearing, requiring him to pay restitution in the amount of $43,469.72. See RSA 651:63 (Supp. 2022). The defendant argues that the evidence was insufficient to support the amount of restitution ordered. As the appealing party, the defendant has the burden of demonstrating reversible error. Gallo v. Traina, 166 N.H. 737, 740 (2014). Based upon our review of the trial court’s well-reasoned order, the defendant’s challenges to it, the relevant law, and the record submitted on appeal, we conclude that the defendant has not demonstrated reversible error and affirm the court’s decision. See id.; Sup. Ct. R. 25(8).
Affirmed.
MacDonald, C.J., and Hicks, Bassett, Hantz Marconi, and Donovan, JJ., concurred.
Timothy A. Gudas, Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State of New Hampshire v. Richard Mooney, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-new-hampshire-v-richard-mooney-nh-2023.