State of Missouri v. Hickey

247 S.W.3d 593, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 354
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 18, 2008
DocketED 89540
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 247 S.W.3d 593 (State of Missouri v. Hickey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State of Missouri v. Hickey, 247 S.W.3d 593, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 354 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Pietro Hickey appeals the judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of first degree robbery and armed criminal action. We find that the trial court did not err in failing to sua sponte declare a mistrial based on the State’s comments during closing argument. We also find that evidence was sufficient to support Hickey’s convictions.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 80.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hickey v. State
328 S.W.3d 225 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)
Betzold v. RENAISSANCE GUILD, LLC
247 S.W.3d 593 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
247 S.W.3d 593, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 354, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-missouri-v-hickey-moctapp-2008.