State of Minnesota v. Cree Rae Larson

Opinion

OFFICE

APPELLATE COURTS

STATE OF MINNESOTA

AUG 1 9 2015

IN SUPREME COURT

FILED

A14-0128

State of Minnesota, Appellant,

vs. Cree Rae Larson, Respondent.

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that in light of our opinion in State v. Lindquist, No.

Al2-0599, N.\V.2d (Minn. Aug. 19, 2015), holding that the exclusionary rule does not apply to violations of the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, or Article I, Section 10, of the Minnesota Constitution, when law enforcement acts in good faith, objectively reasonable reliance on binding appellate precedent, the decision of the court of appeals is reversed and this matter is remanded to the district court for trial.

Dated: August 19, 20 15

~UR!J

,/)ch.

t ~-

G. Barry Anderson

Associate Justice

GILDEA, C.J. dissents. PAGE, J., dissents. LILLEHAUG, J., dissents.

DISSENT

GILDEA, Chief Justice (dissenting).

For the reasons set forth in my dissent in State v. Lindquist, No. A12-0599

-

N.W.2d - (Minn. Aug. 19, 2015), I respectfully dissent.

DISSENT

PAGE, Justice (dissenting).

For the reasons set forth in my dissent in State v. Lindquist, No. Al2-0599, N.W. 2d _(Minn. Aug. 19, 2015), I respectfully dissent.

DISSENT

LILLEHAUG, Justice (dissenting).

For the reasons set fmih in my dissent in State v. Lindquist, No. Al2-0599, _ N.W.2d _(Minn. Aug. 19, 2015), I respectfully dissent.