State of Minnesota v. Cree Rae Larson
This text of State of Minnesota v. Cree Rae Larson (State of Minnesota v. Cree Rae Larson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OFFICE APPELLATE COURTS STATE OF MINNESOTA AUG 1 9 2015 IN SUPREME COURT FILED A14-0128
State of Minnesota,
Appellant,
vs.
Cree Rae Larson,
Respondent.
ORDER
Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that in light of our opinion in State v. Lindquist, No.
Al2-0599, N.\V.2d (Minn. Aug. 19, 2015), holding that the exclusionary rule
does not apply to violations of the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, or Article
I, Section 10, of the Minnesota Constitution, when law enforcement acts in good faith,
objectively reasonable reliance on binding appellate precedent, the decision of the court of
appeals is reversed and this matter is remanded to the district court for trial.
Dated: August 19, 20 15
~UR!J ,/)ch. t ~- G. Barry Anderson Associate Justice GILDEA, C.J. dissents.
PAGE, J., dissents.
LILLEHAUG, J., dissents.
2 DISSENT
GILDEA, Chief Justice (dissenting).
For the reasons set forth in my dissent in State v. Lindquist, No. A12-0599
- N.W.2d - (Minn. Aug. 19, 2015), I respectfully dissent.
D-1 DISSENT
PAGE, Justice (dissenting).
For the reasons set forth in my dissent in State v. Lindquist, No. Al2-0599,
N.W. 2d _(Minn. Aug. 19, 2015), I respectfully dissent.
LILLEHAUG, Justice (dissenting).
For the reasons set fmih in my dissent in State v. Lindquist, No. Al2-0599, _
N.W.2d _(Minn. Aug. 19, 2015), I respectfully dissent.
D-1
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State of Minnesota v. Cree Rae Larson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-minnesota-v-cree-rae-larson-minn-2015.