State of Maine v. Lund
This text of State of Maine v. Lund (State of Maine v. Lund) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE OF MAINE SUPERIOR COURT KENNEBEC, ss CRIMINAL ACTION REC'E) & FILED DOCKET NO. CR-06-330 A. ~esjardin ' I
JUN 12 2006 sTATEoFMAINE Clerkofcourts v. Kenneb€3CCounty ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO SUPPRESS WILLIAM LUND
Defendant
The findings of fact made on the record at the close of the hearing are
incorporated into tlus order by reference.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
The questions asked by the officer that are at issue in this motion were not
administrative questions. See State v. Rossinnol, 627 A.2d 524, 526 (Me. 1993). The issue is whether the defendant was in custody. An "ordinary traffic stop to ask a few
questions and to conduct field sobriety tests on a driver suspected of operating under
the influence does not amount to custodial interrogation" that requires a r a n d a
warnings. See State v. Lewry, 550 A.2d 64/65 (Me. 1988); see Berkemer v. McCartv,
468 U.S. 420,423 (1984) (defendant questioned outside his vehcle on side of road); State
v. Swett, 1998 ME 76, ¶4, 709 A.2d 727, 730 (defendant interviewed either whle seated
in his vehicle or outside h s vehicle on side of road).
Considering the factors outlined in State v. Michaud, viewed in their totality, the
court concludes that the defendant was not in custody. See State v. Michaud, 1998 ME
251, ¶ 4, 724 A.2d 1222, 1226. On this record, a reasonable person in the defendant's
position would not have concluded that he was "in police custody and constrained to a
degree associated with formal arrest." See id. Accordingly, no Wranda warnings were required in order for the defendant's answers to the officer's questions to be admissible.
See State v. Hollowa~2000 ME 172 q[ 13,760 A.2d 223,228. The entry is
The Defendant's Motion to Suppress is DENIED.
Date: June 1 2 2006 STATE OF MAINE SUPERIOR COURT vs KENNEBEC, ss . WILLIAM H LUND Docket No AUGSC-CR-2006-00330 28 CRESTWOOD DR. APT H WATERVILLE ME 04901 DOCKET RECORD
DOB: 07/22/1974 Attorney: JASON JABAR State's Attorney: TRACY DEVOLL JABAR BATTEN RINGER & MURPHY ONE CENTER STREET WATERVILLE ME 04901-5495 RETAINED 01/06/2006
Charge (s1 1 OPERATING UNDER THE INFLUENCE 12/16/2005 WATERVILLE Seq 9878 29-A 2411(1-A) (A) Class D GARDINER / WAT
Docket Events: 03/14/2006 Charge (s): 1 TRANSFER - TRANSFER FOR JURY TRIAL ED1 ON 03/14/2006 @ 18:01
TRANSFERRED CASE: SENDING COURT CASEID WATDCCR200503168 FILING DOCUMENT - NON CASH BAIL BOND FILED ON 12/19/2005
Charge(s): 1 HEARING - ARRAIGNMENT SCHEDULED FOR 03/08/2006 @ 8:30
NOTICE TO PARTIES/COUNSEL Charge(s1 : 1 HEARING - ARRAIGNMENT WAIVED ON 02/03/2006
BAIL BOND - $700.00 UNSECURED BAIL BOND FILED ON 12/19/2005
Bail A m t : $700 Date Bailed: 12/17/2005 BAIL BOND - UNSECURED BAIL BOND BAIL RELEASED ON 01/18/2006
Date Bailed: 12/17/2005 03/14/2006 BAIL BOND - UNSECURED BAIL BOND RELEASE ACKNOWLEDGED ON 01/18/2006
Date Bailed: 12/17/2005 Party (s): WILLIAM H LUND ATTORNEY - RETAINED ENTERED ON 01/06/2006
Attorney : JASON JABAR MOTION - MOTION AMEND BAIL CONDITIONS FILED BY DEFENDANT ON 01/06/2006
MOTION - MOTION AMEND BAIL CONDITIONS GRANTED ON 01/13/2006 ROBERT E MULLEN , JUDGE COPY TO PARTIES/COUNSEL DEFENDANT MUST APPEAR TO SIGN NEW BOND Charge (s): 1 Page 1 of 3 Printed on: 06/12/2006 WILLIAM H LUND AUGSC-CR-2006-00330 DOCKET RECORD SUPPLEMENTAL FILING - COMPLAINT FILED ON 01/06/2006
BAIL BOND - PR BAIL BOND FILED ON 01/18/2006
Date Bailed: 01/18/2006 Charge (6): 1 PLEA - NOT GUILTY ENTERED BY COUNSEL ON 02/03/2006
Charge (s): 1 MOTION - MOTION TO SUPPRESS FILED BY DEFENDANT ON 02/03/2006
Charge (s): 1 TRANSFER - TRANSFER FOR JURY TRIAL GRANTED ON 03/14/2006
Charge (6): 1 TRANSFER - TRANSFER FOR JURY TRIAL REQUESTED ON 03/03/2006
Charge(6): 1 FINDING - TRANSFER FOR JURY TRIAL TRANSFERRED ON 03/14/2006
AUGSC 03/15/2006 Charge(6) : 1 TRANSFER - TRANSFER FOR JURY TRIAL R E C W BY COURT ON 03/15/2006
RECEIVED FROM WATERVILLE DISTRICT COURT DOCKET NO: CR-05-3168 04/14/2006 TRIAL - DOCKET CALL SCHEDULED FOR 05/01/2006 @ 9:00
04/14/2006 TRIAL - DOCKET CALL NOTICE SENT ON 04/14/2006
05/10/2006 TRIAL - DOCKET CALL HELD ON 05/01/2006
05/10/2006 TRIAL - DOCKET CALL SCHEDULED FOR 06/05/2006 @ 10:OO
06/12/2006 TRIAL - DOCKET CALL HELD ON 06/05/2006 NANCY MILLS , JUSTICE Reporter: JANETTE COOK Defendant Present in Court 06/12/2006 Charge (s): 1 TRIAL - JURY TRIAL SCHEDULED FOR 06/13/2006 @ 10:OO
NOTICE TO PARTIES/COUNSEL 06/12/2006 Charge(s) : 1 TRIAL - JURY TRIAL SELECTED ON 06/08/2006
JURY SELECTION 06/12/2006 HEARING - MOTION TO SUPPRESS HELD ON 06/06/2006 NANCY MILLS , JUSTICE Attorney: JASON JABAR DA: BRAD GRANT Reporter: JANETTE COOK Defendant Present in Court 06/12/2006 Charge(s) : 1 MOTION - MOTION TO SUPPRESS DENIED ON 06/12/2006 NANCY MILLS , JUSTICE Page 2 of 3 Printed on: 06/12/2006 WILLIAM H LUND AUGSC-CR-2006-00330 DOCKET RECORD
A TRUE COPY ATTEST : Clerk
Page 3 of 3 Printed on: 06/12/2006
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State of Maine v. Lund, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-maine-v-lund-mesuperct-2006.