STA TE OF MAINE UNIFIED CRIMINAL DOCKET CUMBERLAND, ss No . CR-20-191
STATE OF MAINE
V. ORDER
JOSHUA LOVELL,
Defendant
Before the court is defendant's motion to suppress. A hearing was held on February 1, 2021
and the parties thereafter filed memoranda of law.
At the hearing defense counsel clarified that the basis of the motion was that MDEA
officers did not have reasonable articulable suspicion to stop a vehicle in which Joshua Lovell was
riding, which led to the discovery of the illegal drugs on which the charges against Lovell are
based.
The court finds as follows:
Prior to January 11, 2020 Michael Lee, a detective employed by Amtrak with experience
in investigating cases involving the transport of narcotics by train, had been informed by an Amtrak
conductor named Gato that a passenger named Joshua Lovell had made a same-day round trip
from Portland to Haverhill, MA on December 23, 2019 in company with another male and that
after disembarking in Haverhill they had returned to Portland on the next northbound train
approximately 2 hours later. The conductor reported that it appeared as if the males might be high
on drugs.
Detective Lee consulted an Amtrak database and learned that Lovell had previously made
two trips to Haverhill - on December 7 and December 16 - and in each case had stayed only a short time in Haverhill, disembarking from a southbound train and then returning on the next
northbound train. Detective Lee knew that Haverhill was a location where supplies of narcotics
were frequently obtained for distribution to other areas.
Conductor Gato subsequently supplemented the information he had provided to Detective
Lee by informing him that he had noted where Lovell and the other passenger had had been seated
on the December 23 trip and that he had seen what appeared to be a crack pipe on one of those
seats after Lovell had left the train.
There are no assigned seats on the trains between Portland and Lawrence but there is a
manifest listing the passengers to which conductors have access. Detective Lee did not himself see
the crack pipe and there is no evidence that the conductor had any law enforcement training or
other knowledge that would have allowed him to recognize a crack pipe.
According to training that Detective Lee had received from the DEA, passengers who took
quick round trips to places known to be drug distribution centers could be using the train system
to transport drugs. Detective Lee accordingly notified MDEA Special Agent Matt Morrison that
Joshua Lovell had made several quick round trips to Haverhill, 1 that Lovell and his companion
had appeared high on drugs on December 23, and that the conductor has seen what the conductor
had thought was a crack pipe where Lovell and his companion had been sitting. Morrison said he
was not familiar with Lovell but expressed interest if Lovell were to make any quick round trips
in the future
On January 11, 2020 Conductor Gato sent Detective Lee one or more texts stating that
Lovell was again taking a round trip from Portland, again to Haverhill, where Lovell was scheduled
1 Although Detective Lee testified he was aware of three quick round trips by Lovell in December, Morrison recalled that he was informed of two such trips .
2 to spend approximately 3 8 minutes between the time he disembarked from a southbound train and
the time he would reboard a northbound train.
Detective Lee then notified Agent Morrison that Lovell was again making a quick round
trip to Haverhill, apparently in the company of a Silas Lovell. Morrison knew that MDEA had
previously received information from Detective Lee which had led to arrests and seizures of drugs.
He also knew Haverhill to be a location from which illegal drugs were transported to Maine. 2
Morrison learned when the train transporting Lovell was scheduled to arrive and obtained
a driver's license photo of Lovell, from which he also learned that Lovell was not from Portland
but from somewhere north of Portland. He then waited in the station and saw someone whose
appearance matched Lovell's driver's license photo, trailed by a small child who Morrison thought
was trying to keep up, walk through the station with the disembarking passengers without pausing.
Morrison then followed that man outside the station, where the man got into a Honda Civic which
was right outside in the waiting lane. As the car drove away, Morrison made the decision to stop
the vehicle and communicated that to other officers who stopped the vehicle on the ramp leading
to I-295 South. 3
2 Agent Morrison also made internal inquiries as to whether Maine law enforcement officers had infonnation linking Joshua Lovell to drug activity and he was told that there had been some kind of contact possibly related to drugs (referred to at one point as "drug calls for service") involving Lovell in Harrison or Bridgton . Since no other details were given and the cou11 does not understand the meaning and cannot weigh the significance of a "drug call for service," it does not give any weight to that information in dete1mining whether reasonable a11iculable suspicion existed.
3 Since the sole focus of the suppression hearing was on whether Agent Morrison had a reasonable a11iculable suspicion to stop the vehicle in which Lovell was a passenger, no evidence was offered as to what had transpired after the stop.
3 Discussion
The State has the burden of demonstrating by a preponderance that Agent Morrison had a
reasonable articulable suspicion to stop the vehicle in which Lovell was riding as it drove away
from the train station on January 11, 2020.
In order to justify a brief investigatory stop of a motor vehicle, a law enforcement officer
must have an objectively reasonable articulable suspicion that criminal conduct has occurred or is
occurring. State v. LaForge, 2012 ME 65 ,r 8, 43 A.3d 961. A reasonable articulable suspicion is
"considerably less" than proof of wrongdoing by a preponderance of the evidence and need not
rise to the level of probable cause. "The suspicion need only be more than speculation or an
unsubstantiated hunch." Id ,r 10, quoting State v. Porter, 2008 ME 175 ,r 9,960 A.2d 321.
When Morrison made the decision to stop the vehicle in which Lovell was a passenger, he
had received information from Amtrak Detective Lee that Lovell had made two prior quick round
trips from Portland to Haverhill, a location which Morrison knew to be a distribution point for
illegal drugs. Making such trips was consistent with someone picking up illegal drugs and
importing them to Maine.
Morrison also knew from Lee that Lovell was making another quick round trip to Haverhill
that same day - a trip in which it appeared Lovell had travelled down to Portland, boarded a
southbound train, got off in Haverhill, and spent only 38 minutes in Haverhill before boarding a
northbound train. Detective Lee was an experienced law enforcement officer whose information
had led to seizures and arrests in the past, and he told Agent Morrison when Lovell's train was
scheduled to arrive - information that was confirmed when Morrison saw someone matching the
photo on Lovell's driver's license walk through the station.
4 Detective Lee had also reported to Morrison the information Lee had received from
Conductor Gato that Lovell and a companion had appeared high on the December 23 trip and that
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
STA TE OF MAINE UNIFIED CRIMINAL DOCKET CUMBERLAND, ss No . CR-20-191
STATE OF MAINE
V. ORDER
JOSHUA LOVELL,
Defendant
Before the court is defendant's motion to suppress. A hearing was held on February 1, 2021
and the parties thereafter filed memoranda of law.
At the hearing defense counsel clarified that the basis of the motion was that MDEA
officers did not have reasonable articulable suspicion to stop a vehicle in which Joshua Lovell was
riding, which led to the discovery of the illegal drugs on which the charges against Lovell are
based.
The court finds as follows:
Prior to January 11, 2020 Michael Lee, a detective employed by Amtrak with experience
in investigating cases involving the transport of narcotics by train, had been informed by an Amtrak
conductor named Gato that a passenger named Joshua Lovell had made a same-day round trip
from Portland to Haverhill, MA on December 23, 2019 in company with another male and that
after disembarking in Haverhill they had returned to Portland on the next northbound train
approximately 2 hours later. The conductor reported that it appeared as if the males might be high
on drugs.
Detective Lee consulted an Amtrak database and learned that Lovell had previously made
two trips to Haverhill - on December 7 and December 16 - and in each case had stayed only a short time in Haverhill, disembarking from a southbound train and then returning on the next
northbound train. Detective Lee knew that Haverhill was a location where supplies of narcotics
were frequently obtained for distribution to other areas.
Conductor Gato subsequently supplemented the information he had provided to Detective
Lee by informing him that he had noted where Lovell and the other passenger had had been seated
on the December 23 trip and that he had seen what appeared to be a crack pipe on one of those
seats after Lovell had left the train.
There are no assigned seats on the trains between Portland and Lawrence but there is a
manifest listing the passengers to which conductors have access. Detective Lee did not himself see
the crack pipe and there is no evidence that the conductor had any law enforcement training or
other knowledge that would have allowed him to recognize a crack pipe.
According to training that Detective Lee had received from the DEA, passengers who took
quick round trips to places known to be drug distribution centers could be using the train system
to transport drugs. Detective Lee accordingly notified MDEA Special Agent Matt Morrison that
Joshua Lovell had made several quick round trips to Haverhill, 1 that Lovell and his companion
had appeared high on drugs on December 23, and that the conductor has seen what the conductor
had thought was a crack pipe where Lovell and his companion had been sitting. Morrison said he
was not familiar with Lovell but expressed interest if Lovell were to make any quick round trips
in the future
On January 11, 2020 Conductor Gato sent Detective Lee one or more texts stating that
Lovell was again taking a round trip from Portland, again to Haverhill, where Lovell was scheduled
1 Although Detective Lee testified he was aware of three quick round trips by Lovell in December, Morrison recalled that he was informed of two such trips .
2 to spend approximately 3 8 minutes between the time he disembarked from a southbound train and
the time he would reboard a northbound train.
Detective Lee then notified Agent Morrison that Lovell was again making a quick round
trip to Haverhill, apparently in the company of a Silas Lovell. Morrison knew that MDEA had
previously received information from Detective Lee which had led to arrests and seizures of drugs.
He also knew Haverhill to be a location from which illegal drugs were transported to Maine. 2
Morrison learned when the train transporting Lovell was scheduled to arrive and obtained
a driver's license photo of Lovell, from which he also learned that Lovell was not from Portland
but from somewhere north of Portland. He then waited in the station and saw someone whose
appearance matched Lovell's driver's license photo, trailed by a small child who Morrison thought
was trying to keep up, walk through the station with the disembarking passengers without pausing.
Morrison then followed that man outside the station, where the man got into a Honda Civic which
was right outside in the waiting lane. As the car drove away, Morrison made the decision to stop
the vehicle and communicated that to other officers who stopped the vehicle on the ramp leading
to I-295 South. 3
2 Agent Morrison also made internal inquiries as to whether Maine law enforcement officers had infonnation linking Joshua Lovell to drug activity and he was told that there had been some kind of contact possibly related to drugs (referred to at one point as "drug calls for service") involving Lovell in Harrison or Bridgton . Since no other details were given and the cou11 does not understand the meaning and cannot weigh the significance of a "drug call for service," it does not give any weight to that information in dete1mining whether reasonable a11iculable suspicion existed.
3 Since the sole focus of the suppression hearing was on whether Agent Morrison had a reasonable a11iculable suspicion to stop the vehicle in which Lovell was a passenger, no evidence was offered as to what had transpired after the stop.
3 Discussion
The State has the burden of demonstrating by a preponderance that Agent Morrison had a
reasonable articulable suspicion to stop the vehicle in which Lovell was riding as it drove away
from the train station on January 11, 2020.
In order to justify a brief investigatory stop of a motor vehicle, a law enforcement officer
must have an objectively reasonable articulable suspicion that criminal conduct has occurred or is
occurring. State v. LaForge, 2012 ME 65 ,r 8, 43 A.3d 961. A reasonable articulable suspicion is
"considerably less" than proof of wrongdoing by a preponderance of the evidence and need not
rise to the level of probable cause. "The suspicion need only be more than speculation or an
unsubstantiated hunch." Id ,r 10, quoting State v. Porter, 2008 ME 175 ,r 9,960 A.2d 321.
When Morrison made the decision to stop the vehicle in which Lovell was a passenger, he
had received information from Amtrak Detective Lee that Lovell had made two prior quick round
trips from Portland to Haverhill, a location which Morrison knew to be a distribution point for
illegal drugs. Making such trips was consistent with someone picking up illegal drugs and
importing them to Maine.
Morrison also knew from Lee that Lovell was making another quick round trip to Haverhill
that same day - a trip in which it appeared Lovell had travelled down to Portland, boarded a
southbound train, got off in Haverhill, and spent only 38 minutes in Haverhill before boarding a
northbound train. Detective Lee was an experienced law enforcement officer whose information
had led to seizures and arrests in the past, and he told Agent Morrison when Lovell's train was
scheduled to arrive - information that was confirmed when Morrison saw someone matching the
photo on Lovell's driver's license walk through the station.
4 Detective Lee had also reported to Morrison the information Lee had received from
Conductor Gato that Lovell and a companion had appeared high on the December 23 trip and that
what the conductor thought was a crack pipe had been seen where they were sitting. Counsel for
Lovell argues that the information obtained from conductor Gato is inadmissible hearsay that
cannot form the basis for reasonable articulable suspicion. First, Detective Lee had confirmed
Gato' s information as to Lovell's multiple quick round trips to Haverhill in an Amtrak database.
Second, Gato was not an anonymous tipster but an identified individual whose job as conductor
would specifically include observation of the actions and appearance of passengers. Third, unlike
a situation where unadorned information was provided with no explanation as to how that
information had been obtained, see Florida v. JL., 529 U.S. 266, 271 (2000), the conductor's
information included the details of what he had observed and what he had learned and allowed an
assessment of the basis of the information he had provided.
This information added up to "more than speculation or an unsubstantiated hunch," State
v. LaForge, 2012 ME 65 ~ 8, and constituted the basis for reasonable articulable suspicion on the
part of Agent Morrison that Lovell was involved in the importation of drugs.
As noted above, the defense objected on hearsay grounds to the information indirectly
provided the Agent Morrison via Detective Lee from Conductor Gato. However, the Law Court
has found that evidence that would otherwise constitute hearsay is admissible on a suppression
motion when it is offered as information to support a reasonable articulable suspicion and not
offered for the truth of the matter asserted. State v. Vaughn, 2009 ME 63 ~ 7, 974 A.2d 930.
Detective Lee testified at the suppression hearing. Conductor Gato did not, but the Vaughn
decision establishes that subject to consideration of its potential reliability, indirect information
5 (even information that would be characterized as double hearsay) may still constitute a sufficient
basis for a reasonable articulable suspicion. Id ~~ 8-10.
As the court infom1ed counsel at the hearing, while it reserved decision on the defense's
hearsay objection, it anticipated that the evidence offered by the State would be admissible but
might or might not constitute a sufficiently reliable basis for reasonable articulable suspicion. In
this case, the court finds the evidence admissible under Vaughn and also concludes, for the reasons
set forth above, that the information obtained by Agent Morrison was sufficiently reliable to form
the basis for reasonable articulable suspicion.
Two other arguments have been raised by the defense. The first is that because the
information provided by Conductor Gato about the December 23 trip was almost three weeks old
as of the January 11 stop, it was too stale to constitute a basis for reasonable articulable suspicion.
The problem with this argument is that the January 11 stop was not solely based on three week old
information but was also based on contemporaneous information that, on January 11 itself, Lovell
- after two similar trips within the past month- was taking another round trip rail trip to Haverhill
on which he was scheduled to spend only 38 minutes in Haverhill - a time short enough to obtain
drugs but seemingly too short for other purposes. 4
The second argument raised by the defense is that the court should depart from the
reasonable articulable suspicion standard derived from federal law and impose a considerably
higher standard under the Maine Constitution. This would constitute a significant departure from
prior Law Court decisions such as those cited above. Moreover, in the absence of a contrary ruling
from the Law Court, trial courts are obliged to follow the existing guidance that Art. I, § 5 of the
4 In finding reasonable articulable suspicion, the cou11 places greater reliance on Lovell's repeated round trips to Haverhil l with quick turnarounds than it does on the conductor's observations of what the conductor thought was a crack pipe, since no basis was orfi red with respect to the conductor's ability to recognize a crack pipe.
6 Maine Constitution is interpreted as coextensive with the Fourth Amendment of the U.S.
Constitution. See, e.g., State v. LaFond, 2002 ME 124 ~ 6 n.2, 802 A.2d 425; State v. Gulick, 2000
·ME 170 ~ 9 n.3 , 759 A.2d 1085,
Defendant's motion to suppress is denied.
Dated: April l '2-, 2021
Thomas D. Warren Justice, Superior Court
7 STATE OF MAINE CRIMINAL DOCKET vs CUMBERLAND, ss. JOSHUA LOVELL Docket No CUMCD-CR-2020-00191 221 WEBBER BROOK ROAD OXFORD ME 04270 DOCKET RECORD DOB: 09/10/1988 Attorney: DEVENS HAMLEN State's Attorney: JONATHAN SAHRBECK HEMINWAY HAMLEN LAWCENTER PA PO BOX4784 PORTLAND ME 04112 APPOINTED 01/13/2020 Filing Document: CRIMINAL COMPLAINT Major Case Type: FELONY (CLASS A,B,C) Filing Date: 01/13/2020 Charge(s) 1 AGGRAVATED TRAFFICKING OF SCHEDULED DRUGS 01/11/2020 PORTLAND Seq 13783 17-A 1105-A(l)(M) Class A
2 UNLAWFUL POSSESSION OF COCAINE 01/11/2020 PORTLAND Seql3375 17-A 1107-A(l)(B)(2) ClassC
3 ENDANGERING THE WELFARE OF A CHILD 01/11/2020 PORTLAND Seq 13129 17-A 554(l)(C) Class D
4 VIOLATING CONDITION OF RELEASE Ol/ 11/2020 PORTLAND Seq 9632 15 1092(l)(A) Class E
Docket Events: 01/13/2020 FILING DOCUMENT- CRIMINAL COMPLAINT FILED ON 01/13/2020
01/13/2020 Charge(s): 1,2,3,4 HEARING - INITIAL APPEARANCE SCHEDULE OTHER COURT ON 01/13/2020 at 01:00 p.m. in Room No.
PORSC 01/14/2020 Charge(s): 1,2,3,4 HEARING - INITIAL APPEARANCE HELD ON 01/13/2020 JED FRENCH ,JUDGE DA: JONATHAN SAHRBECK Defendant Present in Court FTRl 01/14/2020 Charge(s): 1,2,3,4 PLEA - NO ANSWER ENTERED BY DEFENDANT ON 01/13/2020
01/14/2020 BAIL BOND - $10,000.00 CASH BAIL BOND SET BY COURT ON 01/13/2020 JED FRENCH ,JUDGE OR PR AND MPTSC NO CONTACT HAYDEN EDWARDS 02/16/1996 01/14/2020 MOTION - MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF CNSL FILED BY DEFENDANT ON 01/13/2020
01/14/2020 MOTION - MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF CNSL GRANTED ON 01/13/2020 JED FRENCH , JUDGE COPY TO PARTIES/COUNSEL 01/14/2020 Party(s): JOSHUA LOVELL ATTORNEY - APPOINTED ORDERED ON 01/13/2020
Attorney: DEVENS HAMLEN 01/14/2020 HEARING - DISPOSITIONAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 04/29/2020 in Room No. 7
CR-200 Page 1 of 4 Printed on: 04/20/2021 JOSHUA LOVELL CUMCD-CR-2020-00191 DOCKET RECORD
01/14/2020 Charge(s): 1,2,3,4 TRIAL - JURY TRIAL SCHEDULED FOR 06/22/2020 at 08:30 a.m. in Room No. 11
NOTICE TO PARTIES/COUNSEL 01/30/2020 OTHER FILING - PRETRIAL SERVICES CONTRACT FILED ON 01/30/2020
01/31/2020 OTHER FILING - PRETRIAL SERVICES CONTRACf APPROVED ON 01/30/2020 JED FRENCH , JUDGE 02/04/2020 BAIL BOND - PR BAIL BOND FILED ON 02/04/2020
Date Bailed: 01/30/2020 02/04/2020 MOTION - OTHER MOTION FILED BY DEFENDANT ON 02/04/2020
Attorney: DEVENS HAMLEN TO SET FOR BAIL HEARING 02/05/2020 MOTION - OTHER MOTION GRANTED ON 02/05/2020 DEBORAH CASHMAN , JUDGE TO SET FOR BAIL HEARING 02/05/2020 HEARING - BAIL HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 02/11/2020 at 01:00 p.m. in Room No.
NOTICE TO PARTIES/COUNSEL 02/05/2020 HEARING - BAIL HEARING NOTICE SENT ELECTRONICALLY ON 02/05/2020
02/12/2020 HEARING - BAIL HEARING HELD ON 02/11/2020 ROBERT E MULLEN , JUSTICE Attorney: DEVENS HAMLEN DA: JOHANNA GAUVREAU Defendant Present in Court FTR CR#l BAIL ADDRESSED. RESET TO 2-25-20 TO READDRESS. 02/12/2020 HEARING - BAIL HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 02/25/2020 at 01:00 p.m. in Room No. 1
NOTICE TO PARTIES/COUNSEL 02/12/2020 HEARING - BAIL HEARING NOTICE SENT ELECTRONICALLY ON 02/12/2020
02/12/2020 MOTION - MOTION TO AMEND BAIL FILED BY DEFENDANT ON 02/12/2020
Attorney: DEVENS HAMLEN 02/12/2020 MOTION - MOTION TO AMEND BAIL GRANTED ON 02/12/2020 JED FRENCH , JUDGE COPY TO PARTIES/COUNSEL 02/21/2020 OTHER FILING - PRETRIAL SERVICES CONTRACT FILED ON 02/19/2020
AMENDED 02/24/2020 OTHER FILING - PRETRIAL SERVICES CONTRACT APPROVED ON 02/24/2020 THOMAS D WARREN , JUSTICE 02/25/2020 BAIL BOND - PR BAIL BOND AMENDED ON 02/25/2020 JED FRENCH ,JUDGE AMENDED FURTHER BY J. KENNEDY 3-27-20 - CURFEW REMAINS THE SAME 9-6 WITH ANY EXCEPTIONS BEING PRE-APPROVED BY MAINE PRETRIAL SERVICES. MR LOVELL SHALL BE PERMITTED TO TRAVEL ONE TIME TO MASSACHUSETTS ON MAY 18, 2020 TO ATTEND HIS COURT DATE AT THE HAVERHILL DISTRICT COURT. CR-200 Page 2 of 4 Printed on: 04/20/2021 JOSHUA LOVELL CUMCD-CR-2020-00191 DOCKET RECORD Date Bailed: 01/30/2020 02/26/2020 HEARING - BAIL HEARING HELD ON 02/25/2020 JED FRENCH , JUDGE Attorney: DEVENS HAMLEN DA: BRENDAN O'BRIEN Defendant Present in Court CURFEW AMENDED BY AGREEMENT. REQUEST TO LEAVE STATE FOR COURT DATE IN MASSACHUSETTS IN MARCH GRANTED. REQUEST DENIED AS TO MARIJUANA AMENDMENT. 03/19/2020 HEARING - DISPOSITIONAL CONFERENCE CONTINUED ON 03/13/2020
PER ORDER OF THE SJC. 03/27/2020 MOTION - MOTION TO AMEND BAIL FILED BY DEFENDANT ON 03/26/2020
Attorney: DEVENS HAMLEN VIA EMAIL NO OBJECTION BY STATE PAPER COPY OF MOTION TO AMEND BAIL RECEIVED VIA REGULAR MAIL 3/30 03/27/2020 MOTION - MOTION TO AMEND BAIL GRANTED ON 03/27/2020 MARY GAY KENNEDY , JUSTICE COPY TO PARTIES/COUNSEL RE: CURFEW AND ABILITY TO LEA VE THE STATE. 04/03/2020 MOTION - MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FILED BY STATE ON 03/26/2020
INDICTMENT 04/03/2020 MOTION - MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME GRANTED ON 04/02/2020 MARY GAY KENNEDY , JUSTICE COPY TO PARTIES/COUNSEL 05/12/2020 Charge(s): 1,2,3,4 TRIAL - JURY TRIAL CONTINUED ON 05/12/2020
PER PMO-SJC-1 5-5-2020 06/25/2020 HEARING - DISPOSITIONAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULE OTHER COURT ON 07/14/2020 at 02:20 p.m. in Room No. 7
PORSC 06/25/2020 HEARING - DISPOSITIONAL CONFERENCE NOTICE SENT ELECTRONICALLY ON 06/25/2020
07/15/2020 HEARING - DISPOSITIONAL CONFERENCE HELD ON 07/14/2020 MARY GAY KENNEDY , JUSTICE Attorney: DEVENS HAMLEN DA: JOHANNA GAUVREAU HELD VIA TELECOFNERENCE. NO AGREEMENT. SET FOR DISPO. 07/15/2020 HEARING - DISPOSITIONAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULE OTHER COURT ON 09/02/2020 at 03:00 p.m. in Room No . 7
PORSC 07/15/2020 HEARING - DISPOSITIONAL CONFERENCE NOTICE SENT ELECTRONICALLY ON 07/15/2020
NOTICE SENT WITH TIME BALWARD 08.21.20 07/30/2020 Charge(s): 1,2,3 ,4 SUPPLEMENTAL FILING - INDICTMENT FILED ON 07/24/2020
08/04/2020 Charge(s): 1,2,3,4 MOTION - MOTION TO SUPPRESS FILED BY DEFENDANT ON 08/04/2020
Attorney: DEVENS HAMLEN CR-200 Page 3 of 4 Printed on: 04/20/2021 JOSHUA LOVELL CUMCD-CR-2020-00191 DOCKET RECORD 09/02/2020 HEARING - DISPOSITIONAL CONFERENCE HELD ON 09/02/2020 THOMAS MCKEON , JUSTICE Attorney: DEVENS HAMLEN DA : JOHANNA GAUVREAU OFFER MADE 01/11/2021 HEARING - MOTION TO SUPPRESS SCHEDULE OTHER COURT ON 02/01/2021 at 01:00 p.m . in Room No . 9
PORSC 01/11/2021 HEARING - MOTION TO SUPPRESS NOTICE SENT ELECTRONICALLY ON 01/11/2021
02/01/2021 HEARING - MOTION TO SUPPRESS HELD ON 02/01/2021 in Room No. 9 THOMAS D WARREN , JUSTICE Attorney: DEVENS HAMLEN DA: JOHANNA GAUVREAU Defendant Present in Court 02/03/2021 OTHER FILING - OTHER DOCUMENT FILED ON 02/03/2021
DA: JOHANNA GAUVREAU STATE'S CLOSING ARGUMENT RESPONDING TO HEARSAY OBJECTION AND OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE 02/12/2021 OTHER FILING - OTHER DOCUMENT FILED ON 02/11/2021
Attorney: DEVENS HAMLEN DEFENDANT'S CLOSING ARGUMENT AND RESPONSE TO STATE'S BRIEF 02/17/2021 Charge(s): 1,2,3 ,4 MOTION - MOTION TO SUPPRESS UNDER ADVISEMENT ON 02/01/2021 THOMAS D WARREN , JUSTICE 02/17/2021 CASE STATUS - CASE FILE LOCATION ON 02/17/2021
WITH JUSTICE WARREN 04/20/2021 CASE STATUS - CASE FILE RETURNED ON 04/20/2021
04/20/2021 Charge(s): 1,2,3,4 MOTION - MOTION TO SUPPRESS DENIED ON 04/15/2021 THOMAS D WARREN , JUSTICE COPY TO PARTIES/COUNSEL 04/20/2021 ORDER - COURT ORDER FILED ON 04/15/2021 THOMAS D WARREN , JUSTICE MOTION TO SUPPRESS IS DENIED
A TRUE COP~ ~ lJL.e.-.. ATIEST: - -- -- -- -- - - Clerk
CR-200 Page 4 of 4 Printed on: 04/20/2021