State of Maine v. Harding

CourtSuperior Court of Maine
DecidedJune 13, 2011
DocketKENcr-10-875
StatusUnpublished

This text of State of Maine v. Harding (State of Maine v. Harding) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State of Maine v. Harding, (Me. Super. Ct. 2011).

Opinion

STATE OF MAINE SUPERIOR COURT KENNEBEC, SS. CRIMINAL ACTION Docket No. CR-I0-875 ~~c'~ (i'\ . ,.~ . !<.~- 1':.0 / ' STATE OF MAINE

v. ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS ALAN F. HARDING,

Defendant

I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The complaint before this court was initially filed in the Augusta District Court

on or about November 1, 2010. On November 16, 2010, counsel for the defendant

entered an appearance, a waiver of the reading of the complaint, and an entry of a plea

of not guilty to all counts in the complaint. Defendant submitted a timely jury trial

request on or about December 3, 2010.

No motions were filed in the District Court prior to transfer to the Superior

Court. The matter was initially scheduled for a docket call in the Superior Court on

January 4, 2011. At the request of the defendant, the matter was continued to the March

docket call date. Again in March, the matter was continued, at the defendant's request,

to the June 7, 2011 docket call. On June 7, 2011, counsel for the defendant appeared,

and the defendant was ordered to appear June 10 for jury selection for the pending

matter.

On June 9, 2011, defendant filed the pending motion to dismiss. The motion to

dismiss asserts that the defendant's right to equal protection was violated by the

initiation of the pending criminal complaint by the Attorney General. Defendant's

motion alleges, in part, "Upon information and belief, criminal prosecution is reserved for taxpayers who have failed to acknowledge their duties to file returns and pay taxes

or fail to cooperate with the tax examiners assigned to their case by the Maine Revenue

Service." Defendant's motion further alleges, "Defendant is being prosecuted as a

consequence of his political affiliations and statements which conflicted with Assistant

District Attorney John Pluto."l

The morning after the motion was filed, on the day of jury selection on June 10,

2011, the State filed a written objection to the defendant's motion to dismiss. The State's

objection disputed the assertions raised in the defendant's motion and further argued

that the defendant's motion failed to demonstrate the elements necessary to show

discriminatory prosecution as set forth in State v. Heald, 382 A.2d 290, 300-01 (Me. 1978).

II. ANALYSIS

Without addressing the substantive issues raised by the defendant's motion to

dismiss or the State's opposition thereto, the court denies the defendant's motion to

dismiss based upon its failure to comply with the provisions of Rules 12(b)(2) & (3) of

the Maine Rules of Criminal Procedure. The issues raised within the defendant's

motion to dismiss, filed the day before jury selection, would squarely fit within the type

of defense or objection, based upon an alleged defect in the institution of the

prosecution, that is contemplated by Rule 12(b)(2). That subsection of the Rule goes on

to note, in pertinent part: "Failure to present any such defense or objection as herein

provided constitutes a waiver thereof, but the court for cause shown may grant relief

from the w ai veL"

1 The defendant's motion was accompanied by no supporting affidavit, nor was any request for a hearing included with the motion. In a chamber conference at the time of jury selection on June 10, 2011, counsel for the defendant referred to wanting an evidentiary hearing on the issues raised in the defendant's pending motion to dismiss.

2 Rule 12(b)(3) of the Maine Rules of Criminal Procedure clearly requires that all

motions shall be filed within twenty-one days after entry of a plea unless the court

specifies a different time. As noted, the defendant's plea was entered in this matter on

November 16, 2010, almost seven months before the filing of the motion to dismiss. The

motion was not accompanied by any request for late filing, nor was there any

demonstration of any cause for which such late filing would be justified?

For the reasons stated, the defendant's motion to dismiss is DENIED.

DATED: f t ~/t I

2 The purported bases for the motion to dismiss relates to information of which defendant was purportedly aware at the time the complaint itself was filed rather than the eve of jury selection.

3 STATE OF MAINE SUPERIOR COURT vs KENNEBEC, ss. ALAN F HARDING Docket No AUGSC-CR-2010-00875 5 BARTON STREET PRESQUE ISLE ME 04769 DOCKET RECORD

DOB: 07/13/1953 Attorney: WALTER MCKEE State's Attorney: GREGG BERNSTEIN LIPMAN & KATZ & MCKEE, PA 227 WATER STREET PO BOX 1051 AUGUSTA ME 04332-1051 RETAINED 11/16/2010

Filing Document: CRIMINAL COMPLAINT Major Case Type: MISDEMEANOR (CLASS D,E) Filing Date: 11/01/2010

Charge(s)

1 FAILURE TO PAY TAX OR FILE RETURN 04/16/2005 AUGUSTA Seq 9977 36 5332(1) Class D

2 FAILURE TO PAY TAX OR FILE RETURN 04/19/2006 AUGUSTA Seq 9977 36 5332(1) Class D

3 FAILURE TO PAY TAX OR FILE RETURN 04/18/2007 AUGUSTA Seq 9977 36 5332 (1) Class D

4 FAILURE TO PAY TAX OR FILE RETURN 04/16/2008 AUGUSTA Seq 9977 36 5332 (1) Class D

5 FAILURE TO PAY TAX OR FILE RETURN 04/16/2009 AUGUSTA Seq 9977 36 5332 (1) Class D

6 FAILURE TO PAY TAX OR FILE RETURN 04/16/2010 AUGUSTA Seq 9977 36 5332(1) Class D

7 FAILURE TO PAY TAX OR FILE RETURN 04/16/2005 AUGUSTA Seq 9977 36 5332 (1) Class D

8 FAILURE TO PAY TAX OR FILE RETURN 04/19/2006 AUGUSTA Seq 9977 36 5332 (1) Class D

9 FAILURE TO PAY TAX OR FILE RETURN 04/18/2007 AUGUSTA Seq 9977 36 5332(1) Class D

10 FAILURE TO PAY TAX OR FILE RETURN 04/16/2008 AUGUSTA Page 1 of 5 Printed on: 06/13/2011 ALAN F HARD I NG AUGSC-CR-2010-00875 DOCKET RECORD Seq 9977 36 5332 (1) Class D

11 FAILURE TO PAY TAX OR FILE RETURN 04/16/2009 AUGUSTA Seq 9977 36 5332 (1) Class D

12 FAILURE TO PAY TAX OR FILE RETURN 04/16/2010 AUGUSTA Seq 9977 36 5332(1) Class D

Docket Events:

12/06/2010 Charge(s): 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12 TRANSFER - TRANSFER FOR JURY TRIAL EDI ON 12/06/2010 @ 18:00

TRANSFERRED CASE: SENDING COURT CASEID AUGDCCR201002039 FILING DOCUMENT - CRIMINAL COMPLAINT FILED ON 11/01/2010

Charge(s): 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12 HEARING - ARRAIGNMENT SCHEDULED FOR 11/17/2010 @ 10:00 in Room No. 1

NOTICE TO PARTIES/COUNSEL Charge(s): 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12 HEARING - ARRAIGNMENT WAIVED ON 11/17/2010

Party(s) : STATE OF MAINE ATTORNEY - RETAINED ENTERED ON 11/01/2010

Attorney: GREGG BERNSTEIN Charge(s): 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12 SUMMONS/SERVICE - SUMMONS TO APPEAR FOR ARRAIGN ISSUED FOR 11/01/2010

Party (s) : STATE OF MAINE ATTORNEY - RETAINED ENTERED ON 11/01/2010

Attorney: EVERT FOWLE Party(s) : ALAN F HARDING ATTORNEY - RETAINED ENTERED ON 11/16/2010

Attorney: WALTER MCKEE Charge(s): 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12 PLEA - NOT GUILTY ENTERED BY DEFENDANT ON 11/17/2010

Charge(s): 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12 MOTION - MOTION FOR DISCOVERY FILED BY DEFENDANT ON 11/16/2010

Charge(s): 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12 TRIAL - BENCH SCHEDULED FOR 01/04/2011 @ 8:30 in Room No. 1

NOTICE TO PARTIES/COUNSEL Charge(s): 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12 Page 2 of 5 Printed on: 06/13/2011 ALAN F HARDING AUGSC-CR-2010-00875 DOCKET RECORD TRIAL - BENCH NOT HELD ON 12/06/2010

Charge(s): 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12 TRIAL - BENCH NOTICE SENT ON 11/18/2010

Charge(s): 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12 HEARING - MOTION FOR DISCOVERY SCHEDULED FOR 01/04/2011 @ 8:30 in Room No. 1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Heald
382 A.2d 290 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
State of Maine v. Harding, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-maine-v-harding-mesuperct-2011.