State of Maine v. Awad

CourtSuperior Court of Maine
DecidedApril 4, 2022
DocketCUMcr-21-3200
StatusUnpublished

This text of State of Maine v. Awad (State of Maine v. Awad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State of Maine v. Awad, (Me. Super. Ct. 2022).

Opinion

STATE OF MAINE UNIFIED CRIMINAL DOCKET CUMBERLAND, ss. DOCKET NO. CUMCD-CR-21-3200

) STATE OF MAINE, ) ) ) v. ) ) ORDER DENYING BAIL ) ABDI AWAD, ) ) Defendant. ) )

On August 5, 2021, Defendant Abdi Awad was indicted for violation of 17-A

M.R.S. § 20l(l)(A), Intentional or Knowing Murder. Defendant requests an order setting

bail. A Harnish bail hearing was held on February 28, 2022. The State presented thirty­

two exhibits, as well as an affidavit of Detective Daniel L. Townsend of the Portland

Police Department, dated November 1, 2021 ("Townsend Nov. Aff."). Defendant

presented eleven exhibits and the testimony of Detective Townsend. At the State's

request, evidence was reopened to allow the State to supplement the record with two

additional affidavits. 1 After careful review of all the evidence, the Court denies

Defendant's motion for bail for the following reasons.

I. Findings of Fact

From the exhibits, testimony, and affidavits presented by the State and Defendant,

the Court finds that the following information is known to the police:

On August 1, 2011, at 4:25 a.m., Officer Deanna Hernandez responded to the Mobil

on the Run at 1196 Congress Street, Portland, Maine, for a report that a male had been

1 Affidavit of Detective Kelly Gorham, dated November 11, 2018, filed in State v. AT&T re 207-420-0302 and

207-420-0828, CUMCD-SW-2018-249 ("Gorham Aff."), and Affidavit of Detective Daniel L. Townsend, dated June 4, 2021, filed in In re 121 Massachusetts Ave, CUMCD-SW-2021-119 (impounded) ("Townsend June Aff.").

Page 1 of 11 shot. (Gorham Aff. '[ 1.) Upon arrival, Officer Hernandez observed the victim lying on

his back in the middle of Congress Street. (Gorham Aff. '[ 1.) She saw what appeared to

be a gunshot wound on his left side. (Gorham Aff. '[ 1.) The victim was identified as Allen

Patrick MacLean. (Gorham Aff. '[ 1.)

Several witnesses were standing near Mr. MacLean' s body. (Gorham Aff. '[ 2.) One

witness, Robert Lewis, was working at the Mobil on the Run at the time of the shooting.

(Gorham Aff. '[ 3.) He reported that he had stepped outside to smoke a cigarette when he

heard a loud bang. (Gorham Aff. '[ 3.) He witnessed a white male running across the

street yelling, 'Tm bleeding, I'm bleeding." (Gorham Aff. '[ 3.) Other witnesses similarly

reported hearing a loud crack or boom and seeing a man run from the area of 4

Massachusetts Avenue, yelling 'Tm dying, I'm dying," or "Help me, help me." (Gorham

Aff. '['[ 4, 5.)

Officers entered the apartment at 4 Massachusetts Avenue, where they found a

person who identified himself as Khalid Said. (Gorham Aff. '[ 6.) Mr. Said said that

Mohamed Said (known as "Camel"), Benjamin Anthony (known as "Icy"), and two white

females were also at the apartment at 4 Massachusetts Avenue that evening. (Gorham

Aff. '[ 10.) They were awakened by gunshots and people screaming. (Gorham Aff. '[ 10.)

Officer Stickney and his K9 partner, Taz, responded to the scene for a track.

(Gorham A££.'[ 7.) Near 28Massachusetts Avenue, Taz alerted in the area of some bushes.

(Gorham Aff. '[ 7.) Officer Stickney located a small black handgun, which was identified

as a Kel-Tec .380. (Gorham Aff. '[ 7.) Evidence Technician Stearns swabbed the exposed

side of the gun and collected it. (Gorham Aff. '[ 30.) Evidence Technician Cote swabbed

the left side of the handgun, as well as the round in the chamber and the two rounds in

the magazine. (Gorham Aff. '[ 31.) No impressions of comparable quality were developed

on the handgun. (Gorham Aff. '[ 32.)

Page 2 of 11 ET Cote also collected from the scene: an orange Gatorade bottle, a black t-shirt, a

bullet casing, an empty Bud Light can, and a Poland Spring bottle. (Gorham Aff. 'll 28.) A

small plastic bag containing what appeared to be marijuana was also collected. (Gorham

Aff. 'l[ 29.) Impressions were lifted from the Gatorade bottle, but they were of limited

value for comparison. (Gorham Aff. 'l[ 32.)

A .380 caliber bullet was removed from Mr. MacLean's body during an autopsy.

(Townsend Nov. Aff. 'l[ l.) Robert Burns, a firearms examiner for the Maine State Police

Crime Laboratory, concluded that the bullet located in Mr. MacLean's body and the

casing found at the scene were fired from the handgun recovered from the bushes.

(Townsend Nov. Aff. 'l[ 11.)

A mixture of DNA profiles from at least two individuals was obtained from the

handgun. (Gorham Aff. 'l[ 38.) Defendant was not identified as a potential donor for the

mixed DNA profiles from the swabs of the handgun, ammo, magazine, or small plastic

bag. 2 The DNA profiles on these items were not consistent with the DNA profiles of

Khalid Said or Mr. MacLean. (Gorham Aff. 'l['l[ 38, 39.)

On August 3, 2011, Mr. Said returned to the police station to speak with Detective

Lisa Sweatt. (Gorham Aff. 'l[ 11.) Detective Sweatt showed Mr. Said a photo book.

(Gorham Aff. 'l[ 11.) Mr. Said identified Photo #4, which is a photo of Defendant, as "L."

(Gorham Aff. 'l[ 11.) Mr. Said said that L was in his apartment the night of the shooting.

(Gorham Aff. 'l[ 11.) Mr. Said described Las having long hair that he keeps in a ponytail

or dreads, and, on the night of the shooting, he was wearing a black shirt, black shorts,

2 At hearing, conflicting evidence was presented on this topic. Detective Townsend testified that Defendant

was neither included nor excluded as a potential donor for the mixed DNA profiles, while the Gorham Affidavit indicates that Defendant was excluded as a potential donor. (See Gorham Aff. 'l[ 44.)

Page 3 of 11 and a fitted hat. 3 (Gorham Aff. 'l[ 11.) He said that L was "on the phone a lot" and went

outside several times. (Gorham Aff. 'l[ 11.) Mr. Said saw L go outside shortly before he

heard gunshots and did not see him again. (Gorham Aff. 'l[ 11.) He told Detective Sweatt,

"I guess I just gave you the shooter." (Gorham Aff. 'l[ 11.) When asked why he hadn't

provided this information earlier, Mr. Said said that police had not asked about L.

(Gorham Aff. 'l[ 11.) Mr. Said had never seen L with a gun. (Gorham Aff. 'l[ 11.)

On August 5, 2011, police received a report of a cell phone found in a yard at 121

Massachusetts Avenue. (Gorham Aff. 'l[ 23.) An examination of the phone revealed the

number (207) 420-0302. (Gorham Aff. 'l[ 23.) No impressions of comparable quality were

developed on the phone, and the swab of the phone did not produce an interpretable

DNA profile. (Gorham Aff. 'l['l[ 36, 42.)

Detective Sweatt and Detective Paul Murphy contacted Eamon O'Connor, who

had been with Mr. MacLean on the night of the shooting. (Gorham Aff. 'l[ 12.) At some

point in the evening, Mr. O'Connor drove Mr. MacLean to the area of Massachusetts

Avenue and Bolton Street to buy drugs. (Gorham Aff. 'l[ 14.) Mr. MacLean used Mr.

O'Connor's phone to call"Ali" at either (207) 420-0302 or (207) 420-0203. (Gorham Aff. 'l[

14.) Mr. MacLean's friends reported that Mr. MacLean owed people money and appeared

nervous about meeting Ali. (Townsend Nov. Aff. 'l[ 3.) Mr. O'Connor did not know or see

the drug dealer. (Gorham Aff. 'l[ 14.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Eaton
669 A.2d 146 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1995)
Harnish v. State
531 A.2d 1264 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1987)
State of Maine v. Michael Journet
2018 ME 114 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 2018)
State v. Lagasse
2016 ME 158 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 2016)
State v. Journet
191 A.3d 1181 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
State of Maine v. Awad, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-maine-v-awad-mesuperct-2022.