State of Louisiana Versus Randy Allen Fink

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedMarch 20, 2020
Docket20-KA-115
StatusUnknown

This text of State of Louisiana Versus Randy Allen Fink (State of Louisiana Versus Randy Allen Fink) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State of Louisiana Versus Randy Allen Fink, (La. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 20-KA-115

VERSUS FIFTH CIRCUIT

RANDY ALLEN FINK COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF LOUISIANA

ON APPEAL FROM THE TWENTY-FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 18-5357, DIVISION "K" HONORABLE ELLEN SHIRER KOVACH, JUDGE PRESIDING

March 20, 2020

ROBERT A. CHAISSON JUDGE

Panel composed of Judges Susan M. Chehardy, Jude G. Gravois, and Robert A. Chaisson

APPEAL DISMISSED RAC SMC JGG CHAISSON, J.

Defendant, Randy Fink, appeals three misdemeanor convictions. For the

reasons that follow, we dismiss defendant’s appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

On October 9, 2018, the Jefferson Parish District Attorney filed a bill of

information charging defendant with three misdemeanors: domestic abuse battery

(La. R.S. 14:35.3), simple battery (La. R.S. 14:35), and violation of a protective

order (La. R.S. 14:79). On October 17, 2019, following a bench trial, defendant

was found guilty as charged. On October 24, 2019, the trial court imposed a

sentence of six months in parish prison on each count to run concurrently,

suspended all but forty-eight hours of the sentence, and placed defendant on active

probation for two years. Defendant thereafter filed a motion for appeal, which was

granted by the trial court on November 27, 2019.

Appellate jurisdiction extends only to cases that are triable by a jury. La.

Const. Art. 5, § 10; La. C.Cr.P. art. 912.1. To be eligible for trial by jury in a

misdemeanor case, an accused must be faced with imprisonment for more than six

months and/or a fine of more than one thousand dollars. La. C.Cr.P. art. 779; State

v. Hunter, 15-69 (La. App. 5 Cir. 2/11/15), 168 So.3d 773, 774. When the State

charges a defendant with two or more misdemeanors in a single bill of information

or indictment, La. C.Cr.P. art. 493.1 limits the maximum aggregate penalty that

may be imposed for all of the misdemeanors to six months imprisonment or a fine

of one thousand dollars, or both. As such, when two or more misdemeanors are

joined in a single bill of information, the case is not triable by a jury. State v.

Chess, 00-164 (La. App. 5 Cir. 6/27/00), 762 So.2d 1286, 1287-88.

In the present case, defendant was charged by a single bill of information

with three misdemeanors: domestic abuse battery, simple battery, and violation of

20-KA-115 1 a protective order.1 Because these three misdemeanors were joined in a single bill

of information, the maximum aggregate penalty was limited to six months

imprisonment or a fine of one thousand dollars, or both. Thus, the case was not

triable by a jury and is not appealable. Under La. C.Cr.P. art. 912.1(C)(1), an

application for a writ of review is the proper mechanism for seeking judicial

review of a conviction on an offense not triable by a jury.

Accordingly, we dismiss the present appeal. We reserve, however,

defendant’s right to file a proper application for supervisory writs, in compliance

with U.R.C.A. Rule 4-1 et seq., within thirty days from the date of this opinion.

Further, we hereby construe defendant’s motion for appeal as a notice of intent to

seek a supervisory writ, so defendant is not required to file a notice of intent nor

obtain an order setting a return date pursuant to U.R.C.A. Rule 4-3.

APPEAL DISMISSED

1 The penalty provisions for these misdemeanor offenses, as set forth in La. R.S. 14:35.3, La. R.S. 14:35, and La. R.S. 14:79, provide for the possibility of imprisonment for not more than six months.

20-KA-115 2 SUSAN M. CHEHARDY CURTIS B. PURSELL

CHIEF JUDGE CLERK OF COURT

MARY E. LEGNON FREDERICKA H. WICKER CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK JUDE G. GRAVOIS MARC E. JOHNSON ROBERT A. CHAISSON SUSAN BUCHHOLZ STEPHEN J. WINDHORST FIRST DEPUTY CLERK HANS J. LILJEBERG JOHN J. MOLAISON, JR. FIFTH CIRCUIT MELISSA C. LEDET JUDGES 101 DERBIGNY STREET (70053) DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL STAFF POST OFFICE BOX 489 GRETNA, LOUISIANA 70054 (504) 376-1400

(504) 376-1498 FAX www.fifthcircuit.org

NOTICE OF JUDGMENT AND CERTIFICATE OF DELIVERY I CERTIFY THAT A COPY OF THE OPINION IN THE BELOW-NUMBERED MATTER HAS BEEN DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH UNIFORM RULES - COURT OF APPEAL, RULE 2-16.4 AND 2-16.5 THIS DAY MARCH 20, 2020 TO THE TRIAL JUDGE, CLERK OF COURT, COUNSEL OF RECORD AND ALL PARTIES NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL, AS LISTED BELOW:

20-KA-115 E-NOTIFIED 24TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT (CLERK) HONORABLE ELLEN SHIRER KOVACH (DISTRICT JUDGE) THOMAS J. BUTLER (APPELLEE) KATHERINE M. FRANKS (APPELLANT)

MAILED NO ATTORNEYS WERE MAILED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Hunter
168 So. 3d 773 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2015)
State v. Chess
762 So. 2d 1286 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
State of Louisiana Versus Randy Allen Fink, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-louisiana-versus-randy-allen-fink-lactapp-2020.