State of Louisiana Versus Jamar Williams

• Court: Louisiana Court of Appeal
• Decided: October 19, 2023
• Docket: 23-KA-451
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 23-KA-451

VERSUS FIFTH CIRCUIT

JAMAR WILLIAMS COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF LOUISIANA

ON APPEAL FROM THE TWENTY-FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 22-4205, DIVISION "N" HONORABLE STEPHEN D. ENRIGHT, JR., JUDGE PRESIDING

October 19, 2023

SCOTT U. SCHLEGEL JUDGE

Panel composed of Judges Fredericka Homberg Wicker, Jude G. Gravois, and Scott U. Schlegel

SENTENCE VACATED; REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS SUS FHW JGG SCHLEGEL, J.

Defendant/appellant, Jamar Williams, filed this appeal following his

conviction for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, adjudication as a third

felony offender and sentencing. Based on our review of the record, we vacate

defendant’s sentence and remand this matter to the trial court to rule on

defendant’s pro se motion for new trial filed on June 19, 2023.

On October 21, 2022, defendant was charged with two counts of possession

of a firearm by a convicted felon. On May 22, 2023, a jury found defendant guilty

on Count 1 and not guilty on Count 2. Defendant’s counsel filed a motion for new

trial on May 30, 2023, which the trial court denied on June 15, 2023. On June 19,

2023, defendant filed a pro se motion for new trial including new arguments not

raised in the counseled motion for new trial.1 The transcript from the June 15,

2023 hearing does not include any reference to defendant’s pro se motion and does

not include a discussion of the new arguments raised in the motion. Also, the

record does not contain a ruling or disposition by the trial court on defendant’s pro

se motion for new trial. It is likely, though, that the trial court was not aware of the

filing of the motion for new trial as defendant failed to include an order to set the

motion for hearing.

On July 18, 2023, the trial court sentenced defendant to seven years

imprisonment at hard labor without the benefit of parole, probation, or suspension

of sentence. The State then filed a multiple offender bill on the same day and

defendant pled guilty to being a third felony offender. The trial court vacated

defendant’s original sentence and sentenced defendant pursuant to La. R.S.

15:529.1 to imprisonment at hard labor for 15 years without the benefit of parole,

probation, or suspension of sentence.

1 Our review of the official record indicates that defendant included a cover letter with his pro se motion for new trial dated June 9, 2023, and the envelope containing the motion was postmarked June 14, 2023.

23-KA-451 1 La. C.Cr.P. art. 853 provides that a motion for a new trial must be filed and

disposed of before sentencing. The trial court erred by failing to rule on

defendant’s timely pro se motion for new trial prior to sentencing.2 In State v.

Randolph, 409 So.2d 554 (La. 1981), the Louisiana Supreme Court dealt with the

trial court’s failure to rule on a defendant's new trial motion by vacating his

sentence, remanding the case to the trial court for a ruling, and reserving the

defendant’s right to appeal his conviction and sentence in the event of an

unfavorable ruling on the motion. This Court has acted similarly when the record

contains a motion for new trial which was never ruled upon by the trial court. See

State v. Munson, 11-54 (La. App. 5 Cir. 11/15/11), 78 So.3d 290, 292; State v.

James, 18-212 (La. App. 5 Cir. 11/28/18), 259 So.3d 1255, 1256.

Therefore, we vacate defendant’s sentence and remand to the trial court for a

ruling or disposition on defendant’s pro se motion for new trial, reserving

defendant’s right to appeal his conviction, multiple offender adjudication, and

sentence in the event that the ruling on the motion is adverse to defendant.

SENTENCE VACATED; REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS

2 Such error is noticeable on the face of the record and reviewable as a patent error.

23-KA-451 2 SUSAN M. CHEHARDY CURTIS B. PURSELL

CHIEF JUDGE CLERK OF COURT

SUSAN S. BUCHHOLZ FREDERICKA H. WICKER CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK JUDE G. GRAVOIS MARC E. JOHNSON ROBERT A. CHAISSON LINDA M. WISEMAN STEPHEN J. WINDHORST FIRST DEPUTY CLERK JOHN J. MOLAISON, JR. SCOTT U. SCHLEGEL FIFTH CIRCUIT MELISSA C. LEDET JUDGES 101 DERBIGNY STREET (70053) DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL STAFF POST OFFICE BOX 489 GRETNA, LOUISIANA 70054 (504) 376-1400

(504) 376-1498 FAX www.fifthcircuit.org

NOTICE OF JUDGMENT AND CERTIFICATE OF DELIVERY I CERTIFY THAT A COPY OF THE OPINION IN THE BELOW-NUMBERED MATTER HAS BEEN DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH UNIFORM RULES - COURT OF APPEAL, RULE 2-16.4 AND 2-16.5 THIS DAY OCTOBER 19, 2023 TO THE TRIAL JUDGE, CLERK OF COURT, COUNSEL OF RECORD AND ALL PARTIES NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL, AS LISTED BELOW:

23-KA-451 E-NOTIFIED 24TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT (CLERK) HONORABLE STEPHEN D. ENRIGHT, JR. (DISTRICT JUDGE) THOMAS J. BUTLER (APPELLEE)

MAILED PRENTICE L. WHITE (APPELLANT) ATTORNEY AT LAW LOUISIANA APPELLATE PROJECT 16731 CICERO AVENUE BATON ROUGE, LA 70816