State of Louisiana Versus Edgar Hidalgo

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedAugust 7, 2025
Docket25-KH-330
StatusUnknown

This text of State of Louisiana Versus Edgar Hidalgo (State of Louisiana Versus Edgar Hidalgo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State of Louisiana Versus Edgar Hidalgo, (La. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 25-KH-330

VERSUS FIFTH CIRCUIT

EDGAR HIDALGO COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF LOUISIANA

August 07, 2025

Linda Tran First Deputy Clerk

IN RE EDGAR HIDALGO

APPLYING FOR SUPERVISORY WRIT FROM THE TWENTY-FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF LOUISIANA, DIRECTED TO THE HONORABLE FRANK A. BRINDISI, DIVISION "E", NUMBER 20-5193

Panel composed of Judges Jude G. Gravois, Marc E. Johnson, and Scott U. Schlegel

WRIT DENIED

Relator, Wesley Ricks, seeks review of the trial court’s denial of his motion

to compel discovery in district court number 20-5193, State v. Edgar Hidalgo. In

his motion, Relator requested a free copy of the bill of indictment and bill of

particulars for Mr. Hidalgo’s case. In its denial, the trial court directed Relator to

the Clerk of Court for the 24th Judicial District Court for records request. However,

the trial court also noted that the Clerk of Court is not required to provide third

parties, such as Relator, with free copies of its public records. After review, we

find that the trial court did not err in denying Relator’s motion to compel discovery.

The requested documents Relator seeks are not from his own case, but rather concern

a defendant (Mr. Hidalgo) convicted in a different case and in a different parish other

than Relator’s conviction and sentence. Generally, an incarcerated indigent must

demonstrate a particularized need before receiving a copy of a court document free

of charge. State ex rel. Simmons v. State, 93-275 (La. 12/16/94), 647 So.2d 1094, 1095 (per curiam). We find that Relator’s motion does not show any particularized

need that would entitle him to free copies of the documents he requested for Mr.

Hidalgo’s case.

Accordingly, the writ application is denied.

Gretna, Louisiana, this 7th day of August, 2025.

MEJ JGG SUS SUSAN M. CHEHARDY CURTIS B. PURSELL

CHIEF JUDGE CLERK OF COURT

SUSAN S. BUCHHOLZ FREDERICKA H. WICKER CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK JUDE G. GRAVOIS MARC E. JOHNSON STEPHEN J. WINDHORST LINDA M. TRAN JOHN J. MOLAISON, JR. FIRST DEPUTY CLERK SCOTT U. SCHLEGEL TIMOTHY S. MARCEL FIFTH CIRCUIT MELISSA C. LEDET JUDGES 101 DERBIGNY STREET (70053) DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL STAFF POST OFFICE BOX 489 GRETNA, LOUISIANA 70054 (504) 376-1400

(504) 376-1498 FAX www.fifthcircuit.org

NOTICE OF DISPOSITION CERTIFICATE OF DELIVERY I CERTIFY THAT A COPY OF THE DISPOSITION IN THE FOREGOING MATTER HAS BEEN TRANSMITTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH UNIFORM RULES - COURT OF APPEAL, RULE 4-6 THIS DAY 08/07/2025 TO THE TRIAL JUDGE, THE TRIAL COURT CLERK OF COURT, AND AT LEAST ONE OF THE COUNSEL OF RECORD FOR EACH PARTY, AND TO EACH PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL, AS LISTED BELOW:

25-KH-330 E-NOTIFIED 24th Judicial District Court (Clerk) Honorable Frank A. Brindisi (DISTRICT JUDGE) Thomas J. Butler (Respondent)

MAILED Wesley Sinclair Ricks #499599 (Relator) Louisiana State Penitentiary Angola, LA 70712

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Ex Rel. Simmons v. State
647 So. 2d 1094 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
State of Louisiana Versus Edgar Hidalgo, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-louisiana-versus-edgar-hidalgo-lactapp-2025.