State of Louisiana Versus Edgar Hidalgo
This text of State of Louisiana Versus Edgar Hidalgo (State of Louisiana Versus Edgar Hidalgo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 25-KH-330
VERSUS FIFTH CIRCUIT
EDGAR HIDALGO COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF LOUISIANA
August 07, 2025
Linda Tran First Deputy Clerk
IN RE EDGAR HIDALGO
APPLYING FOR SUPERVISORY WRIT FROM THE TWENTY-FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF LOUISIANA, DIRECTED TO THE HONORABLE FRANK A. BRINDISI, DIVISION "E", NUMBER 20-5193
Panel composed of Judges Jude G. Gravois, Marc E. Johnson, and Scott U. Schlegel
WRIT DENIED
Relator, Wesley Ricks, seeks review of the trial court’s denial of his motion
to compel discovery in district court number 20-5193, State v. Edgar Hidalgo. In
his motion, Relator requested a free copy of the bill of indictment and bill of
particulars for Mr. Hidalgo’s case. In its denial, the trial court directed Relator to
the Clerk of Court for the 24th Judicial District Court for records request. However,
the trial court also noted that the Clerk of Court is not required to provide third
parties, such as Relator, with free copies of its public records. After review, we
find that the trial court did not err in denying Relator’s motion to compel discovery.
The requested documents Relator seeks are not from his own case, but rather concern
a defendant (Mr. Hidalgo) convicted in a different case and in a different parish other
than Relator’s conviction and sentence. Generally, an incarcerated indigent must
demonstrate a particularized need before receiving a copy of a court document free
of charge. State ex rel. Simmons v. State, 93-275 (La. 12/16/94), 647 So.2d 1094, 1095 (per curiam). We find that Relator’s motion does not show any particularized
need that would entitle him to free copies of the documents he requested for Mr.
Hidalgo’s case.
Accordingly, the writ application is denied.
Gretna, Louisiana, this 7th day of August, 2025.
MEJ JGG SUS SUSAN M. CHEHARDY CURTIS B. PURSELL
CHIEF JUDGE CLERK OF COURT
SUSAN S. BUCHHOLZ FREDERICKA H. WICKER CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK JUDE G. GRAVOIS MARC E. JOHNSON STEPHEN J. WINDHORST LINDA M. TRAN JOHN J. MOLAISON, JR. FIRST DEPUTY CLERK SCOTT U. SCHLEGEL TIMOTHY S. MARCEL FIFTH CIRCUIT MELISSA C. LEDET JUDGES 101 DERBIGNY STREET (70053) DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL STAFF POST OFFICE BOX 489 GRETNA, LOUISIANA 70054 (504) 376-1400
(504) 376-1498 FAX www.fifthcircuit.org
NOTICE OF DISPOSITION CERTIFICATE OF DELIVERY I CERTIFY THAT A COPY OF THE DISPOSITION IN THE FOREGOING MATTER HAS BEEN TRANSMITTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH UNIFORM RULES - COURT OF APPEAL, RULE 4-6 THIS DAY 08/07/2025 TO THE TRIAL JUDGE, THE TRIAL COURT CLERK OF COURT, AND AT LEAST ONE OF THE COUNSEL OF RECORD FOR EACH PARTY, AND TO EACH PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL, AS LISTED BELOW:
25-KH-330 E-NOTIFIED 24th Judicial District Court (Clerk) Honorable Frank A. Brindisi (DISTRICT JUDGE) Thomas J. Butler (Respondent)
MAILED Wesley Sinclair Ricks #499599 (Relator) Louisiana State Penitentiary Angola, LA 70712
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State of Louisiana Versus Edgar Hidalgo, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-louisiana-versus-edgar-hidalgo-lactapp-2025.