State of Louisiana v. Tim S. Carroll

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedJanuary 15, 2020
Docket2019-KA-0928
StatusPublished

This text of State of Louisiana v. Tim S. Carroll (State of Louisiana v. Tim S. Carroll) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State of Louisiana v. Tim S. Carroll, (La. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

STATE OF LOUISIANA * NO. 2019-KA-0928

VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL TIM S. CARROLL * FOURTH CIRCUIT * STATE OF LOUISIANA *******

APPEAL FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT ORLEANS PARISH NO. 540-945, SECTION “I” Honorable Karen K. Herman, Judge ****** JAMES F. MCKAY III CHIEF JUDGE ****** (Court composed of Chief Judge James F. McKay III, Judge Paula A. Brown, Judge Dale N. Atkins)

LEON J. CANNIZZARO, JR. DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ORLEANS PARISH SCOTT G. VINCENT ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY 619 S. White Street New Orleans, Louisiana 70119 COUNSEL FOR STATE/APPELLEE

DAVID S. MOYER DAVID S. MOYER, LLC 13551 River Road Luling, Louisiana 70070 COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT/ APPELLANT

DISMISSED AND REMANDED

JANUARY 15, 2020 The appellant appeals the ruling of the district court ordering him to pay

restitution. Finding that this Court lacks appellate jurisdiction over the

misdemeanor conviction we exercise our supervisory jurisdiction for the limited

purpose of transferring the matter to the Appellate Division of the Orleans Parish

Criminal District Court.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On November 16, 2018, the appellant entered a no contest plea to a reduced

charge of misdemeanor theft. See R.S. 14:64(B)(4). R., p. 1; p. 42 (Misdemeanor

Constitutional Waiver of Rights form). The district court conducted

restitution/sentencing hearings on January 23, 2019 and February 9, 2019 and

sentenced the appellant to a deferred term of six months’ imprisonment and

ordered that he pay restitution in the amount of $7,460.00 within two years. On

March 12, 2019, the appellant filed a “motion to appeal sentence.” The docket

master reflects that the district court granted a notice of appeal on March 27, 2019,

and the record was lodged in this Court on October 23, 2019. The appellant’s sole

claim is that the district court lacked the authority to impose the term of restitution.

1 DISCUSSION

The merits are not germane to the appellant’s argument as this Court lacks

appellate jurisdiction over the misdemeanor conviction.

The Louisiana Constitution sets out jurisdiction to the appellate courts in

pertinent part as follows:

Except as otherwise provided by this constitution,1 a court of appeal has appellate jurisdiction of . . . (3) all criminal cases triable by a jury . . . . It has supervisory jurisdiction of cases which arise within it circuit.

La. Const. art. V, § 10(A).

La. C.Cr.P. art 779 provides:

A. A defendant charged with a misdemeanor in which the punishment, as set forth in the statute defining the offense, may be a fine in excess of one thousand dollars or imprisonment for more than six months shall be tried by a jury of six jurors, all of whom must concur to render a verdict.

B. The defendant charged with any other misdemeanor shall be tried by the court without a jury.

The appellant pled guilty to a misdemeanor not triable by jury. See R.S.

14:67(B)(4) (setting forth maximum sentence of six months’ imprisonment and/or

fine of not more than $1,000.00). That being the case, this Court lacks appellate

jurisdiction over the case, which is vested exclusively in the Appellate Division of

the Orleans Parish Criminal District Court. See R.S. 13:1337(A) (“. . . . In all

cases tried before the judges of the criminal district court in which an appeal does

not lie to the supreme court [or court of appeal], an appeal shall lie on questions of

law and fact to two or more of the judges of the criminal district court, as

prescribed by said court.”); State v. Morel, 95-0926 (La. App. 4 Cir. 5/1/96), 673

1 In capital cases in which the death penalty has been imposed and when a law or ordinance has been declared unconstitutional, appellate jurisdiction is vested in the Louisiana Supreme Court. La. Const. art. V § 10 (D)(2). 2 So.2d 1291 (“Having determined that appellant's felony convictions are no longer

before this Court, we are compelled to remand his appeal of his misdemeanor

convictions, as there is no direct appeal of misdemeanor convictions to the Courts

of Appeal. The appellant must seek appeal of his misdemeanor conviction to the

Appellate Division of the Criminal District Court for the Parish of Orleans

pursuant to LSA-R.S. 13:1337.”).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal without prejudice but exercise our

supervisory jurisdiction2 for the limited purpose of transferring the case to the

Appellate Division of Criminal District Court. Cf. State v. Earl, 2018-0976 (La.

App. 4 Cir. 12/5/18), 259 So.3d 1105.

2 See La. Const. art. V, § 10(A); La. C.Cr.P. art. 912.1(C). 3

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Earl
259 So. 3d 1105 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
State of Louisiana v. Tim S. Carroll, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-louisiana-v-tim-s-carroll-lactapp-2020.