State of Louisiana v. Tim S. Carroll
This text of State of Louisiana v. Tim S. Carroll (State of Louisiana v. Tim S. Carroll) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE OF LOUISIANA * NO. 2019-KA-0928
VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL TIM S. CARROLL * FOURTH CIRCUIT * STATE OF LOUISIANA *******
APPEAL FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT ORLEANS PARISH NO. 540-945, SECTION “I” Honorable Karen K. Herman, Judge ****** JAMES F. MCKAY III CHIEF JUDGE ****** (Court composed of Chief Judge James F. McKay III, Judge Paula A. Brown, Judge Dale N. Atkins)
LEON J. CANNIZZARO, JR. DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ORLEANS PARISH SCOTT G. VINCENT ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY 619 S. White Street New Orleans, Louisiana 70119 COUNSEL FOR STATE/APPELLEE
DAVID S. MOYER DAVID S. MOYER, LLC 13551 River Road Luling, Louisiana 70070 COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT/ APPELLANT
DISMISSED AND REMANDED
JANUARY 15, 2020 The appellant appeals the ruling of the district court ordering him to pay
restitution. Finding that this Court lacks appellate jurisdiction over the
misdemeanor conviction we exercise our supervisory jurisdiction for the limited
purpose of transferring the matter to the Appellate Division of the Orleans Parish
Criminal District Court.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On November 16, 2018, the appellant entered a no contest plea to a reduced
charge of misdemeanor theft. See R.S. 14:64(B)(4). R., p. 1; p. 42 (Misdemeanor
Constitutional Waiver of Rights form). The district court conducted
restitution/sentencing hearings on January 23, 2019 and February 9, 2019 and
sentenced the appellant to a deferred term of six months’ imprisonment and
ordered that he pay restitution in the amount of $7,460.00 within two years. On
March 12, 2019, the appellant filed a “motion to appeal sentence.” The docket
master reflects that the district court granted a notice of appeal on March 27, 2019,
and the record was lodged in this Court on October 23, 2019. The appellant’s sole
claim is that the district court lacked the authority to impose the term of restitution.
1 DISCUSSION
The merits are not germane to the appellant’s argument as this Court lacks
appellate jurisdiction over the misdemeanor conviction.
The Louisiana Constitution sets out jurisdiction to the appellate courts in
pertinent part as follows:
Except as otherwise provided by this constitution,1 a court of appeal has appellate jurisdiction of . . . (3) all criminal cases triable by a jury . . . . It has supervisory jurisdiction of cases which arise within it circuit.
La. Const. art. V, § 10(A).
La. C.Cr.P. art 779 provides:
A. A defendant charged with a misdemeanor in which the punishment, as set forth in the statute defining the offense, may be a fine in excess of one thousand dollars or imprisonment for more than six months shall be tried by a jury of six jurors, all of whom must concur to render a verdict.
B. The defendant charged with any other misdemeanor shall be tried by the court without a jury.
The appellant pled guilty to a misdemeanor not triable by jury. See R.S.
14:67(B)(4) (setting forth maximum sentence of six months’ imprisonment and/or
fine of not more than $1,000.00). That being the case, this Court lacks appellate
jurisdiction over the case, which is vested exclusively in the Appellate Division of
the Orleans Parish Criminal District Court. See R.S. 13:1337(A) (“. . . . In all
cases tried before the judges of the criminal district court in which an appeal does
not lie to the supreme court [or court of appeal], an appeal shall lie on questions of
law and fact to two or more of the judges of the criminal district court, as
prescribed by said court.”); State v. Morel, 95-0926 (La. App. 4 Cir. 5/1/96), 673
1 In capital cases in which the death penalty has been imposed and when a law or ordinance has been declared unconstitutional, appellate jurisdiction is vested in the Louisiana Supreme Court. La. Const. art. V § 10 (D)(2). 2 So.2d 1291 (“Having determined that appellant's felony convictions are no longer
before this Court, we are compelled to remand his appeal of his misdemeanor
convictions, as there is no direct appeal of misdemeanor convictions to the Courts
of Appeal. The appellant must seek appeal of his misdemeanor conviction to the
Appellate Division of the Criminal District Court for the Parish of Orleans
pursuant to LSA-R.S. 13:1337.”).
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal without prejudice but exercise our
supervisory jurisdiction2 for the limited purpose of transferring the case to the
Appellate Division of Criminal District Court. Cf. State v. Earl, 2018-0976 (La.
App. 4 Cir. 12/5/18), 259 So.3d 1105.
2 See La. Const. art. V, § 10(A); La. C.Cr.P. art. 912.1(C). 3
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State of Louisiana v. Tim S. Carroll, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-louisiana-v-tim-s-carroll-lactapp-2020.