State Of Louisiana v. Sidney Phillips, Jr.

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedOctober 11, 2022
Docket2022KW1093
StatusUnknown

This text of State Of Louisiana v. Sidney Phillips, Jr. (State Of Louisiana v. Sidney Phillips, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State Of Louisiana v. Sidney Phillips, Jr., (La. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 2022 KW 1093

VERSUS

SIDNEY FRANK PHILLIPS, J.R. October 11, 2022

In Re: Sidney Frank Phillips, Jr., applying for supervisory writs, 32nd Judicial District Court, Parish of

Terrebonne, No. 828924.

BEFORE : McDONALD, McCLENDON, AND HOLDRIDGE, JJ. WRIT DENIED.

JMM PMc

Holdridge, J., dissents and would grant the writ application. Only experts are allowed to give opinion testimony in areas of specialized knowledge. State v. Morgan, 2012-2060 (La. App. lst Cir. 6/7/13), 119 So.3d 817, 827. Under La. Code Evid. art. 702, “Tile scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education, may testify thereto in the form of an opinion or otherwise.” In the instant case, I find that the investigating officer should be prohibited from testifying regarding historical cell site data as a lay witness until he lays a proper foundation establishing 1) he has “knowledge of

how a cellphone network operates;” 2) he has “experience in going through volumes of call detail records;” and 3) he has “practical experience in geéeolocating a cell phone that is ‘attached’ to a human being.” Without this proper foundation,

in cases where cell tower mapping is used to establish the location of an accused, an expert in historical cell site analysis is required to interpret and explain the information given by the maps to the jury. See State v. Saltzman, 2013-276 (La. App. 3d Cir. 10/23/13), 128 So.3d 1060, writ denied, 2014- 11 (La. 6/13/14), 140 So.3d 1187, cert denied, Davis v. Louisiana, --- U.S. ---~-, 135 S.Ct. 678, 190 L.Ed.2d 393 (2014). See also United States v. Natal, 849 F.3d 530, 536 (2d Cir. 2017) ("testimony on how cell phone towers operate must be offered by an expert witness.).

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

Or)

DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT FOR THE COURT

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Morgan
119 So. 3d 817 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2013)
State v. Saltzman
128 So. 3d 1060 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2013)
United States v. Natal
849 F.3d 530 (Second Circuit, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
State Of Louisiana v. Sidney Phillips, Jr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-louisiana-v-sidney-phillips-jr-lactapp-2022.