State Of Louisiana v. Sidney Phillips, Jr.
This text of State Of Louisiana v. Sidney Phillips, Jr. (State Of Louisiana v. Sidney Phillips, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 2022 KW 1093
VERSUS
SIDNEY FRANK PHILLIPS, J.R. October 11, 2022
In Re: Sidney Frank Phillips, Jr., applying for supervisory writs, 32nd Judicial District Court, Parish of
Terrebonne, No. 828924.
BEFORE : McDONALD, McCLENDON, AND HOLDRIDGE, JJ. WRIT DENIED.
JMM PMc
Holdridge, J., dissents and would grant the writ application. Only experts are allowed to give opinion testimony in areas of specialized knowledge. State v. Morgan, 2012-2060 (La. App. lst Cir. 6/7/13), 119 So.3d 817, 827. Under La. Code Evid. art. 702, “Tile scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education, may testify thereto in the form of an opinion or otherwise.” In the instant case, I find that the investigating officer should be prohibited from testifying regarding historical cell site data as a lay witness until he lays a proper foundation establishing 1) he has “knowledge of
how a cellphone network operates;” 2) he has “experience in going through volumes of call detail records;” and 3) he has “practical experience in geéeolocating a cell phone that is ‘attached’ to a human being.” Without this proper foundation,
in cases where cell tower mapping is used to establish the location of an accused, an expert in historical cell site analysis is required to interpret and explain the information given by the maps to the jury. See State v. Saltzman, 2013-276 (La. App. 3d Cir. 10/23/13), 128 So.3d 1060, writ denied, 2014- 11 (La. 6/13/14), 140 So.3d 1187, cert denied, Davis v. Louisiana, --- U.S. ---~-, 135 S.Ct. 678, 190 L.Ed.2d 393 (2014). See also United States v. Natal, 849 F.3d 530, 536 (2d Cir. 2017) ("testimony on how cell phone towers operate must be offered by an expert witness.).
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
Or)
DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT FOR THE COURT
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State Of Louisiana v. Sidney Phillips, Jr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-louisiana-v-sidney-phillips-jr-lactapp-2022.