State of Louisiana v. Shelwin Markise Jones

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedMarch 6, 2013
DocketKA-0012-1436
StatusUnknown

This text of State of Louisiana v. Shelwin Markise Jones (State of Louisiana v. Shelwin Markise Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State of Louisiana v. Shelwin Markise Jones, (La. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION

STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT

12-1436

VERSUS

SHELWIN MARKISE JONES

************

APPEAL FROM THE NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF RAPIDES, NO. 267,161 HONORABLE WILLIAM ROSS FOOTE, DISTRICT JUDGE

PHYLLIS M. KEATY JUDGE

Court composed of Elizabeth A. Pickett, Phyllis M. Keaty, and John E. Conery, Judges.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

James M. Buck Assistant District Attorney – 9th JDC P. O. Box 1472 Alexandria, LA 71309 (318) 473-6650 COUNSEL FOR APPELLEE: State of Louisiana

Beth Fontenot Louisiana Appellate Project P. O. Box 3183 Lake Charles, LA 70602 (337) 491-3864 COUNSEL FOR APPELLANT: Shelwin Markise Jones Keaty, Judge.

The Defendant, Shelwin Markise Jones, was charged by bill of information

with carjacking, a violation of La.R.S. 14:64.2, and armed robbery, a violation of

La.R.S. 14:64. On March 3, 2003, the State amended the charge of carjacking to

accessory after the fact and entered a nolle prosequi for the charge of armed

robbery. In exchange, the Defendant entered a guilty plea to accessory after the

fact. On that same date, the Defendant waived sentencing delays, and he was

sentenced to five years at hard labor.

On November 15, 2012, the Defendant filed a motion seeking an appeal,

which was granted by the trial court on November 16, 2012.

On December 28, 2012, this court issued an order for the Defendant to show

cause why his appeal should not be dismissed as untimely perfected, citing

La.Code Crim. P. art. 930.8 and State v. Theard, 04-1212 (La. 6/17/05), 904 So.2d

681. In response, the Defendant conceded that the appeal was untimely perfected

and should be dismissed as untimely.

Accordingly, the Defendant’s appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
State of Louisiana v. Shelwin Markise Jones, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-louisiana-v-shelwin-markise-jones-lactapp-2013.