State of Louisiana v. Sharon Leann Johnson

• Court: Louisiana Court of Appeal
• Decided: May 22, 2024
• Docket: 55,445-KA
• Status: Published

Opinion

Judgment rendered May 22, 2024. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 922, La. C. Cr. P.

No. 55,445-KA

COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA

*****

STATE OF LOUISIANA Appellee

Versus

SHARON LEANN JOHNSON Appellant

Appealed from the First Judicial District Court for the Parish of Caddo, Louisiana Trial Court No. 380,858

Honorable Donald E. Hathaway, Jr., Judge

LOUISIANA APPELLATE PROJECT Counsel for Appellant By: Annette Roach

SHARON LEANN JOHNSON Pro Se

JAMES E. STEWART, SR. Counsel for Appellee District Attorney

JASON W. WALTMAN REBECCA A. EDWARDS Assistant District Attorneys

Before STEPHENS, THOMPSON, and HUNTER, JJ. STEPHENS, J.,

This appeal arises from the First Judicial District Court, Parish of

Caddo, State of Louisiana, the Honorable Donald E. Hathaway, Jr., Judge,

presiding. Defendant, Sharon LeAnn Johnson, has been improperly granted

an appeal from the denial of a resubmitted application for post-conviction

relief. While the original PCR application was wending its way through the

judicial system, this matter was treated as an actual appeal, remanded to the

district court for the appointment of appellate counsel, and the parties filed

briefs on the issues that would have been considered had the trial court

granted the original relief requested, i.e., an out-of-time appeal.

FACTS/PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On January 27, 2021, Ms. Johnson was indicted for the second

degree murder of her nine-month-old baby, H.J., occurring on or about May

2 or May 3, 2020, a violation of La. R.S. 14:30.1. While she was

incarcerated at Caddo Correctional Center, Ms. Johnson gave birth to

another baby, Z.J., who was placed in the guardianship of the foster family

with whom Ms. Johnson’s oldest child, R.B., had been placed following

H.J.’s murder and R.B.’s physical abuse.1 See, State in the Interest of Z.J.,

54,029 (La. App. 2 Cir. 8/11/21), 326 So. 3d 960. On December 22, 2021,

the State filed an amended bill charging Ms. Johnson with one count of

manslaughter, a violation of La. R.S. 14:31, and Ms. Johnson pled guilty

with an agreed-upon sentence of 40 years at hard labor, thus avoiding the

possibility of a life sentence if convicted of second degree murder. A

1 H.J. had head and facial injuries, cuts, whiplash-shaken infant syndrome, internal injuries, and bone fractures. R.B. had two broken legs, a lacerated liver, and other evidence of abuse. special condition of the agreement was that she would testify truthfully

against her co-defendant, Jack Harris.

On March 30, 2022, Ms. Johnson filed a “Motion for Boykin

Transcript, Revocation and/or Sentencing Transcript.” The trial court

granted the motion for the transcript in a ruling filed April 12, 2022. Here is

where the procedural trail splits somewhat. On October 26, 2022, in No.

55,191-KH, Ms. Johnson filed an application for post-conviction relief

(“PCR”), seeking an out-of-time appeal. She raised an ineffective assistance

of counsel claim, urging her attorney’s failure to timely appeal her

conviction/sentence constituted error. On January 11, 2023, in No. 55,445-

KA, Ms. Johnson resubmitted to the trial court the application for PCR she

had filed in October 2022. (It should not have been accepted per La. C. Cr.

P. art. 930.4). On January 26, 2023, in No. 55,191-KH, the trial court

denied Ms. Johnson’s application for PCR on the showing made. On

February 13, 2023, in No. 55,445-KA, the trial court granted a notice of

intent to appeal the denial of either the resubmitted application for PCR

(no appeal lies from a judgment dismissing an application or otherwise

denying relief-C. Cr. P. art. 930.6(B)) or granted her an appeal from its

denial of the original application for PCR, from which she filed a writ with

the Second Circuit on March 10, 2023, in No. 55,191-KH.

On April 13, 2023, in No. 55,191-KH, the Second Circuit denied the

writ. State v. Sharon LeAnn Johnson, No. 55,191-KH (La. App. 2 Cir.

4/13/23) (not published) (Hunter, J., dissenting). On May 11, 2023, in No.

55,191-KH, Ms. Johnson took writs to the Louisiana Supreme Court.

On July 13, 2023, in No. 55,445-KA, the record was lodged with Second

Circuit, and thereafter, Ms. Johnson and the State filed briefs. (The appeal 2 should have been dismissed at this time as improvidently granted per La. C.

Cr. P. art. 930.6(B)).

Nonetheless, on October 24, 2023, in No. 55,445-KA, the Second

Circuit remanded the matter to the district court for determination of

representation. On October 31, 2023, in No. 55,191-KH, writs were

denied by the Louisiana Supreme Court. State v. Sharon LeAnn Johnson,

23-00671 (La. 10/31/23), 372 So. 3d 810. On November 13, 2023, in No.

55,445-KA, the trial court appointed the Louisiana Appellate Project to

represent Ms. Johnson and supplemented the appellate record with a

transcript of the hearing. On February 29, 2024, and March 07, 2024, in

No. 55,445-KA, briefs were filed by appellate counsel and the State, and the

matter was submitted to a three-judge panel.

DISCUSSION

This appeal is not properly before this Court. First, the district court

erred in reconsidering Ms. Johnson’s resubmitted post-conviction

application as it was identical to the first one that the district court was in the

process of ruling on. La. C. Cr. P. art. 930.4(D) provides that a successive

application shall be dismissed if it fails to raise a new or different claim.

Furthermore, had this “resubmitted” PCR application actually raised a

new or different claim, no appeal lies from the denial of an application for

PCR. La. C. Cr. P. art. 930.6(A) provides that a petitioner may invoke the

supervisory jurisdiction of the court of appeal if the trial court dismisses the

application or otherwise denies relief on an application for post-conviction

relief. No appeal lies from a judgment dismissing or otherwise denying

relief. As noted by the Louisiana Supreme Court, an application for

supervisory writs is the petitioner’s sole method for seeking review of the 3 trial court’s disposition of an application for post-conviction relief. State ex

rel. Washington v. State, 15-1878 (La. 2/17/17), 211 So. 3d 376; State v.

Ford, 96-2919 (La. 5/30/97), 694 So. 2d 917; State v. Clayton, 96-1658 (La.

2/7/97), 687 So. 2d 996; State ex rel. Lewis v. Cr.D.C., 571 So. 2d 659 (La.

1990); State v. Counterman, 475 So. 2d 336 (La. 1985).

Finally, Ms. Johnson’s claims have been fully litigated. This occurred

on October 13, 2023, when the Louisiana Supreme Court denied Ms.

Johnson’s application for a writ of certiorari from this Court’s denial of her

application for a supervisory writ from the district court’s denial of her

initial application for post-conviction relief in No. 55,191-KH.

CONCLUSION

For the reasons set forth above, this appeal is dismissed.

APPEAL DISMISSED.