State Of Louisiana v. Sandy Davis

Opinion

STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 2021 KW 0185

VERSUS

SANDY DAVIS APRIL 26, 2021

In Re: State of Louisiana, applying for supervisory writs,

19th Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge, No. 02- 07- 0534.

BEFORE: GUIDRY, MCCLENDON, AND LANIER, JJ.

WRIT GRANTED. The trial court' s ruling granting the renewed motion to correct illegal [ sentence] pursuant to La. C. Cr. P. art. 882" is reversed. Although denominated a motion to correct an illegal sentence, the filing was a motion to withdraw a guilty plea. While it might be argued that a sentence imposed in connection with an invalid guilty plea is an " illegal" sentence, La. Code Crim. P. art. 882( A) was not intended to

refer to guilty pleas. See State v. Parker, ( La. App. 1st Cir. 1991), 581 So. 2d 314, 318. Further, despite the language of La. Code Crim. P. art. 559, which provides that a court may allow a guilty plea to be withdrawn at any time before sentence, a trial court retains authority, even after to permit the sentencing

withdrawal of a constitutionally infirm guilty plea. State v. Lewis, 421 So. 2d 224, 226 ( La. 1982). However, after sentencing the request is in the nature of postconviction relief, and it must be filed timely under La. Code Crim. P. art. 930. 8. See Lewis, 421 So. 2d at 226; State ex rel. Chauvin, Jr. v. State, 99- 2456 ( La. App. lst Cir. 1/ 28/ 00), 814 So. 2d 1, 2( per

curiam). The defendant' s conviction became final in 2011. See La. Code Crim. P. art. 922( B). His "[ m] otion to correct illegal sentence or, in the alternative, motion to withdraw plea and

vacate convictions" was not filed until June 21, 2018. The renewed motion to correct illegal [ sentence] pursuant to La. C. Cr. P. art. 882" was not filed until 2020. These motions were untimely. See La. Code Crim. P. art. 930. 8.

JMG PMC WIL

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

RAI I--- '

L

DEPUTY ERK OF COURT FOR THE COURT