State of Louisiana v. Robert Lee Heard, Jr.

• Court: Louisiana Court of Appeal
• Decided: December 16, 2020
• Docket: KA-0018-0236
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT

18-236

STATE OF LOUISIANA

VERSUS

ROBERT LEE HEARD, JR.

**********

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA APPEAL FROM THE TWENTY-SEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF ST. LANDRY, NO. 12-4535 HONORABLE D. JASON MECHE, DISTRICT JUDGE

PHYLLIS M. KEATY JUDGE

Court composed of Billy Howard Ezell, Phyllis M. Keaty, and Van H. Kyzar, Judges.

CONVICTION AND SENTENCE VACATED; REMANDED FOR NEW TRIAL.

Paula C. Marx Louisiana Appellate Project Post Office Box 82389 Lafayette, Louisiana 70598-2389 (337) 991-9757 Counsel for Defendant/Appellant: Robert Lee Heard, Jr.

Earl B. Taylor District Attorney Jennifer M. Ardoin Assistant District Attorney Post Office Drawer 1968 Opelousas, Louisiana 70571 (337) 948-0551 Counsel for Appellee: State of Louisiana KEATY, Judge.

On November 20, 2012, Defendant, Robert Lee Heard, Jr., was charged by

grand jury indictment with the first degree murder of his wife, Demetra Doyle, in

violation of La.R.S. 14:30. On August 1, 2017, the State amended the indictment

to charge Defendant with second degree murder, in violation of La.R.S. 14:30.1.

On August 17, 2017, a jury found Defendant guilty as charged of second degree

murder by an 11-1 verdict. Defendant appealed his conviction and sentence,

contending he should have been convicted of manslaughter and that his conviction

was illegal because of the non-unanimous jury verdict.

On November 7, 2018, this court affirmed Defendant’s conviction and

sentence. State v. Heard, 18-236 (La.App. 3 Cir. 11/7/18), 258 So.3d 875, writs

denied, 18-2013, 18-2022 (La. 4/29/19), 268 So.3d 1029, 1033. Regarding

Defendant’s claim that his conviction was illegal because it was the result of a non-

unanimous jury, this court stated:

In his second assignment of error, Defendant contends that his conviction for second degree murder should not stand because it results from a non-unanimous jury verdict, which supports the sufficiency argument herein that the State failed to prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt. Defendant’s argument fails in light of La.Code Crim.P. art. 782(A), which provides, in pertinent part: “Cases in which punishment is necessarily confinement at hard labor shall be tried by a jury composed of twelve jurors, ten of whom must concur to render a verdict.” That particular statute was ruled constitutional in both State v. Bertrand, 08-2215, 08-2311 (La. 3/17/09), 6 So.3d 738, and Apodaca v. Oregon, 406 U.S. 404, 92 S.Ct. 1628, 32 L.Ed.2d 184 (1972).

Id. at 882.

On April 27, 2020, the United States Supreme Court remanded the case to

this court in light of Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 U.S. ___, 140 S.Ct. 1390 (2020).

Heard v. Louisiana, 590 U.S. ___, 140 S.Ct. 2713 (2020). In Ramos, the United

States Supreme Court found non-unanimous jury verdicts unconstitutional. Accordingly, Defendant’s conviction and sentence for second degree murder via a

non-unanimous verdict is vacated, and the case is remanded for a new trial.

DISPOSITION

For the foregoing reasons, the conviction and sentence for second degree

murder of Robert Lee Heard, Jr. is vacated, and the case is remanded for a new

trial.