State of Louisiana v. Phillip Andrew Schane AKA Phillip Schane

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedMarch 13, 2019
DocketKA-0017-0607
StatusUnknown

This text of State of Louisiana v. Phillip Andrew Schane AKA Phillip Schane (State of Louisiana v. Phillip Andrew Schane AKA Phillip Schane) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State of Louisiana v. Phillip Andrew Schane AKA Phillip Schane, (La. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION

STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT

17-607

VERSUS

PHILLIP ANDREW SCHANE A/K/A PHILLIP SCHANE

************ APPEAL FROM THE SIXTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF IBERIA, NO. 22973 HONORABLE PAUL JOSEPH DEMAHY, DISTRICT JUDGE

************

SHANNON J. GREMILLION JUDGE

Court composed of Shannon J. Gremillion, Phyllis M. Keaty, and D. Kent Savoie, Judges.

STAY LIFTED. APPEAL MOOT.

M. Bofill Duhe District Attorney - 16th Judicial District Robert Clauson Vines Assistant District Attorney 300 Iberia Street, Suite 200 New Iberia, LA 70560 (337) 369-4420 COUNSEL FOR APPELLEE: State of Louisiana Edward Kelly Bauman Louisiana Appellate Project P. O. Box 1641 Lake Charles, LA 70602-1641 (337) 491-0570 COUNSEL FOR APPELLANT: Phillip Andrew Schane Gremillion, Judge. On March 13, 2017, Defendant, Phillip Andrew Schane, filed a writ

application with this court seeking review of the trial court’s January 17, 2017 denial

of his motion to reconsider sentence. On April 5, 2017, this court transferred that

writ application to the Louisiana Supreme Court. State v. Schane, 17-247.

On June 29, 2017, this appeal was lodged. In his notice of appeal, Defendant

listed several sentencing errors, including the denial of the motion to reconsider

sentence addressed in the writ application transferred to the supreme court. Because

the appeal involved issues being considered by the supreme court, the appeal

proceedings were stayed. State v. Schane, 17-607 (La.App. 3 Cir. 9/27/17)

(unpublished opinion).1

On April 6, 2018, the supreme court vacated Defendant’s sentence and

remanded the matter to the Sixteenth Judicial District Court for further proceedings

consistent with the views expressed in State v. Montgomery, 13-1163 (La. 6/28/16),

194 So.3d 606, and for resentencing pursuant to La.Code Crim.P. art. 878.1. State

v. Schane, 17-582 (La. 4/6/18), 239 So.3d 286, clarified on rehearing, 17-582 (La.

6/1/18), 244 So.3d 433.

The supreme court has taken action on Defendant’s writ application.

Accordingly, the stay issued on September 27, 2017, is lifted. Furthermore, the

supreme court vacated Defendant’s sentence, necessitating no further action by this

court on Defendant’s appeal. Defendant’s appeal is, therefore, moot.

1 2017 WL 4280781.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Montgomery
194 So. 3d 606 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2016)
State v. Schane
239 So. 3d 286 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
State of Louisiana v. Phillip Andrew Schane AKA Phillip Schane, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-louisiana-v-phillip-andrew-schane-aka-phillip-schane-lactapp-2019.