State of Louisiana v. Norris

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State of Louisiana v. Norris

109 So. 789, 161 La. 995, 1926 La. LEXIS 2168

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJune 28, 1926

DocketNo. 27936.

StatusPublished

This text of 109 So. 789 (State of Louisiana v. Norris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State of Louisiana v. Norris, 109 So. 789, 161 La. 995, 1926 La. LEXIS 2168 (La. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

O’NIELL, C. J.

The defendant has appealed from a conviction and sentence for having whisky in his possession for beverage purposes. The facts of the case and the issues presented are the same as in the case of State v. Norris (No. 27935) 109 So. 787, 1 in which the conviction and sentence were affirmed to-day. For the reasons given in the opinion rendered in that case, the verdict and sentence in this case are affirmed.

ST. PAUL, ROGERS, and BRUNOT, JJ., concur in the-decree..

1

Ante, p. 988.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

O’NIELL, C. J.

The defendant has appealed from a conviction and sentence for having whisky in his possession for beverage purposes. The facts of the case and the issues presented are the same as in the case of State v. Norris (No. 27935) 109 So. 787, 1 in which the conviction and sentence were affirmed to-day. For the reasons given in the opinion rendered in that case, the verdict and sentence in this case are affirmed.

ST. PAUL, ROGERS, and BRUNOT, JJ., concur in the-decree..

1

Ante, p. 988.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

109 So. 789, 161 La. 995, 1926 La. LEXIS 2168, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-louisiana-v-norris-la-1926.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack