State of Louisiana v. Nicole Aymond & Michael Riche

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedNovember 5, 2008
DocketKW-0008-0711
StatusUnknown

This text of State of Louisiana v. Nicole Aymond & Michael Riche (State of Louisiana v. Nicole Aymond & Michael Riche) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State of Louisiana v. Nicole Aymond & Michael Riche, (La. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT P.O. Box 16577 Lake Charles LA 70616 (337) 433-9403

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION

Kenneth Lee Riche' Riche' Law Firm P.O. Box 66656 Baton Rouge LA 70896-665

REHEARING ACTION: November 5, 2008

Docket Number: 08 00711-KW

STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS NICOLE AYMOND & MICHAEL RICHE

Writ Application from Avoyelles Parish Case No. 142,893 / 142,894, 142,895, 142,998

BEFORE JUDGES:

Hon. Oswald A. Decuir Hon. J. David Painter Hon. James T. Genovese

As counsel of record in the captioned case, you are hereby notified that the

application for rehearing filed by Michael Riche has this day been

DENIED. Genovese, J., would grant the rehearing and dissents for the following reasons.

Genovese, J., Upon further review of this matter, I find our prior writ decision in State v. Aymond, an unpublished writ application bearing docket number 08-711 (La.App. 3 Cir. 8/18/08), to be erroneous. I find State v. Matthieu, 506 So.2d 1209 (La. 1987), inapplicable. I find State v. Case, 363 So.2d 486 (La. 1978), and State v. Loera, 530 So.2d 1271 (La.App. 2 Cir. 1988), writs denied, 536 So.2d 1252, (La. 1989), to be applicable. I agree with the trial court’s written reasons for ruling and his ruling granting defendant’s motion to suppress. To rule otherwise is to neuter Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure Article 161 and open the floodgates to “judge shopping.” Without satisfactory proof of one of the judicially recognized exceptions, a city court judge, or any judge authorized to issue a search warrant, cannot simply issue a search warrant outside his jurisdiction in contravention of statutory authorization. Consequently, I would grant the defendant’s application for rehearing.

cc: Hon. Charles A. Riddle III, Counsel for the Respondent Michael Francis Kelly, Counsel for the Applicant Harold Alan Murry, Counsel for the Respondent STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT P.O. Box 16577 Lake Charles LA 70616 (337) 433-9403 STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT P.O. Box 16577 Lake Charles LA 70616 (337) 433-9403

Harold Alan Murry Attorney at Law P. O. Box 506 Alexandria LA 71309

Writ Application from Avoyelles Parish Case No. 142,893 / 142,894, 142,895, 142,998

Hon. Oswald A. Decuir Hon. J. David Painter Hon. James T. Genovese

As counsel of record in the captioned case, you are hereby notified that the

application for rehearing filed by Nicole Aymond has this day been

DENIED. Genovese, J., would grant the rehearing and dissents for the following reasons.

Genovese, J., Upon further review of this matter, I find our prior writ decision in State v. Aymond, an unpublished writ application bearing docket number 08-711 (La.App. 3 Cir. 8/18/08), to be erroneous. I find State v. Matthieu, 506 So.2d 1209 (La. 1987), inapplicable. I find State v. Case, 363 So.2d 486 (La. 1978), and State v. Loera, 530 So.2d 1271 (La.App. 2 Cir. 1988), writs denied, 536 So.2d 1252, (La. 1989), to be applicable. I agree with the trial court’s written reasons for ruling and his ruling granting defendant’s motion to suppress. To rule otherwise is to neuter Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure Article 161 and open the floodgates to “judge shopping.” Without satisfactory proof of one of the judicially recognized exceptions, a city court judge, or any judge authorized to issue a search warrant, cannot simply issue a search warrant outside his jurisdiction in contravention of statutory authorization. Consequently, I would grant the defendant’s application for rehearing.

cc: Hon. Charles A. Riddle III, Counsel for the Respondent Michael Francis Kelly, Counsel for the Applicant Kenneth Lee Riche', Counsel for the Respondent STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT P.O. Box 16577 Lake Charles LA 70616 (337) 433-9403

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Case
363 So. 2d 486 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1978)
State v. Loera
530 So. 2d 1271 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1988)
State v. Matthieu
506 So. 2d 1209 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
State of Louisiana v. Nicole Aymond & Michael Riche, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-louisiana-v-nicole-aymond-michael-riche-lactapp-2008.