State Of Louisiana v. M.P.

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedOctober 21, 2024
Docket2024KW0797
StatusUnknown

This text of State Of Louisiana v. M.P. (State Of Louisiana v. M.P.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State Of Louisiana v. M.P., (La. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 2024 KW 0797 PAGE 1 OF 2) VERSUS

16" D OCTOBER 21, 2024

In Re: M. P., applying for supervisory writs, 21st Judicial District Court, Parish of Tangipahoa, No. 2101151.

BEFORE: GUIDRY, C. J., PENZATO AND STROMBERG, JJ.

WRIT GRANTED. The district court' s ruling denying relator' s motion to quash is reversed. Pursuant ' to La. Ch. Code art. 804, child" is defined as " any person under the age of twenty- one, including an emancipated minor, who commits a delinquent act before attaining seventeen years of age." In this case, it is alleged

that relator committed the offense of attempted first degree rape when he was fourteen years old, and thereafter, the State instituted prosecution prior to his twenty- first birthday. Therefore, relator is considered a child for purposes of

prosecution. See State v. Andrews, 2019- 0606 ( La. App. 4th Cir. 1/ 15/ 20), 364 So. 3d 95, 101, writ granted, 2020- 00463 ( La. 10/ 14/ 20), 302 So. 3d 1108. Thus, the matter is remanded to the district court for further proceedings.

Penzato, J., dissents and would deny the writ. Louisiana Children' s Code article 857( C)( 2) provides:

An adult who is charged with an offense committed at the time he was a child for which the time limitation for the institution of prosecution pursuant to Code of Criminal Procedure Article 571 has not lapsed and for which he was not subject to prosecution as an adult due to his age at the time the offense was committed shall be prosecuted as an adult in the appropriate court exercising criminal

jurisdiction. If convicted, he shall be committed to the custody of the Department of Public Safety and Corrections to be confined in secure placement for a period of time as determined by the court not to exceed the maximum amount of confinement he could have been ordered to serve had he been adjudicated for the offense as a child at the time the offense was committed.

decidingInthe issue of sex offender registration for offenders who were under 14 at the time of the commission of the offenses of aggravated rape and indecent behavior with juveniles and were 20 and 21 at the time of the institution of prosecution, the Louisiana Supreme Court in State I. C. S., v. 2013- 1023 ( La. 7/ 1/ 14), 145 So. 3d 350, 351- 52, noted "[ t] here is no dispute that Art. 857( C) ( 2) applies to the defendants in this case, and that they, accordingly, ` shall be prosecuted as an adult in the appropriate court exercising criminal jurisdiction."' Id. at 354. Relevant to their underlying inquiry, the Court found that Article NO. 2024 KW 0797 PAGE 2 OF 2)

857 ( C) ( 2) provides for prosecution of an adult for a non --prescribed offense he committed as a child.

URT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

EPUTY CLERK OF COURT FOR THE COURT

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

STATE of Louisiana v. I.C.S.; State of Louisiana v. C.M.S.
145 So. 3d 350 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
State Of Louisiana v. M.P., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-louisiana-v-mp-lactapp-2024.