State of Louisiana v. Mason N. Godfrey

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedFebruary 18, 2009
DocketKA-0008-1231
StatusUnknown

This text of State of Louisiana v. Mason N. Godfrey (State of Louisiana v. Mason N. Godfrey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State of Louisiana v. Mason N. Godfrey, (La. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT

KA 08-1231

STATE OF LOUISIANA

VERSUS

MASON GODFREY

************

APPEAL FROM THE FOURTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF CALCASIEU, NO. 20942-07 HONORABLE ARTHUR J. PLANCHARD, DISTRICT JUDGE

JIMMIE C. PETERS JUDGE

Court composed of Sylvia R. Cooks, John D. Saunders, and Jimmie C. Peters, Judges.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

Terri R. Lacy James “David” Caldwell, Jr. Harrell “Butch” Wilson, Jr. Assistant Attorneys General Louisiana Department of Justice Post Office Box 94005 Baton Rouge, LA 70804-9005 (225) 326-6200 ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE: State of Louisiana

Peggy J. Sullivan Louisiana Appellate Project Post Office Box 2775 Monroe, LA 71207-2775 (318) 387-6124 ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT/APPELLANT: Mason Godfrey PETERS, J.

After a jury convicted the defendant, Mason Godfrey, of intimidation of a

public official, a violation of La.R.S. 14:122, and after the trial court sentenced him

on that offense,1 the State of Louisiana (state) charged the defendant by bill of

information as a fourth offender, in violation of La.R.S. 15:529.1. The trial court

subsequently adjudicated the defendant as a fourth felony offender and sentenced him

to serve twenty-five years at hard labor, without benefit of probation, parole, or

suspension of sentence. After the trial court rejected his motion to reconsider his

sentence, the defendant perfected this appeal, asserting three assignments of error.

For the following reasons, we reverse the adjudication and remand the matter to the

trial court for further proceedings. We do so because, in State v. Godfrey, 08-828

(La. App. 3 Cir. ___/___/___), ___ So.2d ___, we reversed the defendant’s

conviction for the predicate offense, intimidation of a public official, entered a verdict

of guilty to the lesser and included offense (threatening a public official, a violation

of La.R.S. 14: 122.2), and remanded the matter to the trial court for sentencing on the

lesser and included offense. This reversal of the underlying conviction requires that

we vacate the habitual offender adjudication and sentence and renders the defendant’s

assignments of error moot.

DISPOSITION

For the foregoing reasons, we vacate the defendant’s adjudication as a fourth

felony offender as well as the sentence imposed. We remand the matter to the trial

court for further proceedings.

1 The trial court sentenced the defendant to serve three years at hard labor.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
State of Louisiana v. Mason N. Godfrey, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-louisiana-v-mason-n-godfrey-lactapp-2009.