State Of Louisiana v. Livingston Alfred, III

Opinion

STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 2021 Kw 0507

VERSUS

LIVINGSTON ALFRED, III JULY 6, 2021

In Re: Livingston Alfred, III, applying for supervisory writs, 23rd Judicial District Court, Parish of

Ascension, No. 586, 228.

BEFORE: CHUTZ, PENZATO, AND LANIER, JJ.

WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Relator failed to include

documentation of a timely request for an extension of the return date. See Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rule 4- 3; see also, State v. Bourg, 2016- 0313 ( La. App. 5th Cir. 6/ 29/ 16), 196 So. 3d 737, 741. Moreover, although it is not a

violation of the Uniform relator failed to include a copy Rules,

of the transcript of the motion to recuse hearing. See City of Baton Rouge v. Plain, 433 So - 2d 710 ( La.), cert. denied, 464 U. S. 896, 104 S. Ct. 246, 78 L. Ed. 2d 235 ( 1983). Supplementation of this writ application and/ or an application for rehearing will not be considered. See Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rules 2- 18. 7 & 4- 9. If relator elects to file a new writ application with this court, the application shall be filed on or before August 6, 2021. Any future filing on this issue should include the entire contents of this application, the

missing item noted above, and a copy of this ruling.

WRC AEP WIL

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

C

DEPUTY C ERK OF COURT FOR THE COURT