State of Louisiana v. Kevin Russell Martin
Opinion
STATE OF LOUISIANA
COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT
12-395
ON REHEARING
STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS KEVIN RUSSELL MARTIN **********
APPEAL FROM THE
THIRTY-FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF JEFFERSON DAVIS, NO. CR-2011-2 HONORABLE STEVE GUNNELL, DISTRICT JUDGE
**********
ELIZABETH A. PICKETT
JUDGE
**********
Court composed of Ulysses Gene Thibodeaux, Chief Judge, Sylvia R. Cooks and Elizabeth A. Pickett, Judges.
Cooks, J., dissents.
AFFIRMED.
Bennett R. Lapoint Assistant District Attorney – Thirty-First Judicial District P. O. Box 1388 Jennings, LA 70546 (337) 824-3311 COUNSEL FOR APPELLEE:
State of Louisiana
Pride Doran The Doran Law Firm P. O. Box 2119 Opelousas, LA 75071 (318) 948-8008 COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT:
Kevin Martin
PICKETT, Judge.
ON REHEARING
The record demonstrates clearly that the initial plea was properly taken.
While the defendant was misinformed regarding parole and good time eligibility, he was allowed to ask the court any questions about his plea and on the form he signed. He indicated he had none. His motion to withdraw his plea was fixed for hearing. At the hearing, he failed to present any evidence. He simply presented an argument that his plea was not knowingly and voluntarily made. He went on to say that “[t]here’s really no argument further than that, Your Honor . . . .”
As the defendant has already had a hearing in the trial court and he failed to show why his plea was not knowingly and voluntarily made, we find no support for the contention that he is entitled to another hearing. The defendant’s conviction is affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State of Louisiana v. Kevin Russell Martin (State of Louisiana v. Kevin Russell Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.