State Of Louisiana v. Kari Hugh

Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided January 9, 2026·No. 2025 KW 1017·Unknown

Opinion

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

STATE OF LOUISTANA NO. 2025 Kw 1017 VERSUS

KARI HUGH JANUARY 9, 2026 In Re: Kari Hugh, applying for supervisory writs, 23rd Judicial

District Court, Parish of Ascension, No. 635837.

BEFORE: MILLER, EDWARDS, AND FIELDS, JJ.

WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Relator failed to comply with Uniform © Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rules 4-5 (A) and (C) (10), by failing to include an affidavit verifying allegations of petition ana service, and ail pertinent court minutes. Furthermore, we note that relator failed to provide a complete copy of the trial transcripts and any exhibits introduced at the trial, which would

be necessary to review her claims. See City of Baton Rouge v. Plain, 433 So.2d 710 (La.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 896, 104 S.Ct. 246, 78 L.Ed.2d 235 (1983). Supplementation of this writ

application and/or an application for rehearing will not be considered. See Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rules 2-18.7 & 4-9. Inthe event relator elects to file a new application with this court, the application shall be filed on or before March 10, 2026. Any future filing on this issue should include the entire contents of this application, the missing items noted above,

and a copy of this ruling. SMM

BDE WEF

SOQURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State Of Louisiana v. Kari Hugh, (La. Ct. App. 2026).

State Of Louisiana v. Kari Hugh (State Of Louisiana v. Kari Hugh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of Baton Rouge v. Plain
433 So. 2d 710 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1983)