State Of Louisiana v. Joshua Jermaine Calloway

• Court: Louisiana Court of Appeal
• Decided: May 29, 2020
• Docket: 2018KA1724
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL

f yy FIRST CIRCUIT

NO. 2018 KA 1724

VERSUS

JOSHUA JERMAINE CALLOWAY

Judgment Rendered. MAY 2 g 2028

Appealed from the 32nd Judicial District Court In and for the Parish of Terrebonne State of Louisiana Case No. 731417 E

The Honorable Randall L. Bethancourt, Judge Presiding

Bertha M. Hillman Counsel for Defendant/Appellant Covington, Louisiana Joshua Jermaine Calloway

Joseph L. Waitz Counsel for Appellee District Attorney State of Louisiana Ellen Daigle Doskey Assistant District Attorney Houma, Louisiana

BEFORE: GUIDRY, THERIOT, AND PENZATO, JJ. THERIOT, J.

Defendant, Joshua Calloway, was charged by bill of indictment with second

degree murder, a violation of La. R. S. 14: 30. 1. He pled not guilty. After a trial by

jury, defendant was found guilty as charged. The trial court imposed a term of life

imprisonment at hard labor, to be served without the benefit of probation, parole,

or suspension of sentence. Defendant now appeals.' In his sole assignment of

error, defendant challenges his conviction by a non -unanimous jury verdict. In the recent decision of Ramos v. Louisiana, — U.S. _, 140 S. Ct. 1390,

1397, _ L.Ed.2d — ( 2020), 2020 WL 1906545, at * 6, the United States Supreme

Court overruled Apodaca v. Oregon, 406 U.S. 404, 92 S. Ct. 1628, 32 L.Ed.2d 184

1972), and held that the right to a jury trial under the Sixth Amendment of the

United States Constitution, incorporated against the States by way of the

Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution, requires a unanimous

verdict to convict a defendant of a serious offense. The Ramos Court further noted

that its ruling applied to those defendants convicted of felonies by non -unanimous

verdicts whose cases are still pending on direct appeal. Ramos, 140 S. Ct. at 1406,

2020 WL 1906545, at * 13.

Accordingly, defendant' s conviction and sentence are set aside, and the case

is remanded for a new trial.

CONVICTION AND SENTENCE SET ASIDE, REMANDED TO TRIAL COURT FOR NEW TRIAL.

Due to the United States Supreme Court' s grant of certiorari in Ramos v. Louisiana, _ U. S._, 139 S. Ct. 1318, 203 L.Ed. 2d 563 ( 2019), and because the constitutionality of defendant' s conviction by a non -unanimous jury verdict is the sole assignment of error on appeal, this court stayed the instant matter until a ruling was issued in Ramos. See State v. Calloway, 2018- 1724 La. App. 1 st Cir. 4/ 10/ 19) ( unpublished order).