State Of Louisiana v. Joshua E. Dixon

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedJune 16, 2025
Docket2025 KW 0297
StatusUnknown

This text of State Of Louisiana v. Joshua E. Dixon (State Of Louisiana v. Joshua E. Dixon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State Of Louisiana v. Joshua E. Dixon, (La. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 2025 KW 0297

VERSUS

JOSHUA DIXON JUNE 16, 2025

In Re: Joshua Dixon, applying for supervisory writs, 19th Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge, No. 03-12-0911.

BEFORE : McCLENDON, C.J., GREENE AND STROMBERG, JJ.

WRIT DENIED. The Clerk of Court for East Baton Rouge Parish has no record of a “Request for Information under LSA-R.S. 44:1, et seq.” being filed on or about September 16, 2024. As an indigent inmate, relator is entitled to receive certain court documents, such as the guilty plea transcript, the bill of information or indictment, commitment papers, court minutes for various portions of the trial, and minutes of his sentencing, free of charge without the necessity of establishing a particularized need. See State ex rel. Simmons v. State, 93-0275 (La. 12/16/94), 647 So.2d 1094 (per curiam). As to all other documents, an indigent inmate has the constitutional right to free copies only in those instances in which he shows that denial of the request will deprive him of an adequate opportunity to present his claims fairly. Meeting that constitutional threshold requires a showing of a particularized need. An inmate therefore cannot make a showing of particularized need absent a properly filed application for postconviction relief, which sets out specific claims of constitutional errors requiring the requested documentation for support. See State ex rel. Bernard v. Criminal District Court Section "J," 94-2247 (La. 4/28/95), 653 So.2d 1174 (per curiam).

If relator is seeking the requested information under the Public Records Law, a writ application arising in a criminal proceeding is not the proper procedural vehicle to establish a right to those records. See La. R.S. 44:1, et seq. A person who wants to examine public records must make the request to the custodian of records. See La. R.S. 44:31 & 44:32. If a request for public records is denied by the custodian, before seeking relief from this court, the person must first institute civil proceedings for a writ of mandamus at the district court level. See La. R.S. 44:35(A). Should the person prevail, he should be prepared to pay the regular service fees for copies of the documents. After the district court rules in the civil proceeding, the person may seek an appeal of the district court's action, if he desires. See La. R.S. 44:35(C). See also State ex rel. McKnight v. State, 98-2258 (La. App. ist Cir. 12/3/98), 742 So.2d 894, 895 (per curiam).

PMc HG TPS

ud CIRCUIT

DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT FOR THE COURT

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Ex Rel. Simmons v. State
647 So. 2d 1094 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1994)
State Ex Rel. Bernard v. CRIM. DIST. COURT SECTION" J"
653 So. 2d 1174 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1995)
State Ex Rel. McKnight v. State
742 So. 2d 894 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
State Of Louisiana v. Joshua E. Dixon, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-louisiana-v-joshua-e-dixon-lactapp-2025.