State Of Louisiana v. Jaime L. Eraso

Opinion

STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 2020 KW 1343

VERSUS

JAIME L. ERASO MARCH 15, 2021

In Re: Jaime L. Eraso, for 19th applying supervisory writs,

Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge, No. 10- 09- 0034.

BEFORE: McDONALD, HOLDRIDGE, AND PENZATO, JJ.

WRIT DENIED. Relator' s claim that the district court did not consider his age as a mitigating factor in violation of La. Code Crim. P. art. 894. 1 does not point to an illegal term in his sentence. Therefore, his be in claim may not presented a

motion to correct an illegal sentence. State v. Gedric, 99- 1213 La. App. 1st Cir. 6/ 3/ 99), 741 So. 2d 849, 851- 52 ( per curiam),

writ denied, 99- 1830 ( La. 11/ 5/ 99), 751 So. 2d 239. Furthermore, a defendant cannot seek review of a sentence imposed in conformity with a plea agreement forth in which was set the record at the time of the plea. See La. Code Crim. P. art. 881. 2 ( A) ( 2) .

JMM GH AHP

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT FOR THE COURT