State Of Louisiana v. Henry McMillan

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedDecember 20, 2021
Docket2021KW1069
StatusUnknown

This text of State Of Louisiana v. Henry McMillan (State Of Louisiana v. Henry McMillan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State Of Louisiana v. Henry McMillan, (La. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 2021 KW 1069

VERSUS

HENRY J. MCMILLAN DECEMBER 20, 2021

In Re: Henry J. McMillan, applying for supervisory writs,

22nd Judicial District Court, Parish of Washington, No. 15- CR7- 129462.

BEFORE: MCCLENDON, WELCH, AND THERIOT, JJ.

WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. The ruling at issue was rendered on

May 24, 2021. The Notice of Intent is not dated or time - stamped. Therefore, it is not clear if notice to seek

supervisory review was filed within thirty days of the ruling at issue. See Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rules 4- 2 and 4- 5( C)( 11). Moreover, although it is not a violation of the Uniform Rules, we note that PGR counsel did not include any documents from the district court record to support the contention that relator was convicted by a non - unanimous jury verdict. Instead, counsel included a copy of relator' s appellate brief. An appellate court must render its judgment upon the record on appeal, i. e., that which is sent by the lower court to the appellate court and includes the pleadings, court

minutes, transcripts, jury instructions ( if applicable),

judgments, and other rulings, unless otherwise designated. See La. Code Civ. P. arts. 2164 & 2127- 2128; O' Bannon v. Moriah Techs., Inc., 2017- 0728 ( La. App. 1st Cir. 3/ 29/ 18), 248 So. 3d 392, 397. The appellate briefs of the parties are not part of the record on appeal. Thus, this court has no authority to consider facts referred to in appellate briefs or in exhibits attached thereto, if those facts are not in the record on

appeal. See In re J. E. T., 2016- 0384 ( La. lst Cir. App. 10/ 31/ 16), 211 So. 3d 575, 580.

Supplementation of this writ application and/ or an application for rehearing will not be considered. See Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rules 2- 18. 7 & 4- 9. In the event counsel elects to file a new application in compliance with the Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rules 4- 2 4- 3, the application shall be filed on or before 31, January 2022. The application should include proof that a timely return date and/ or timely extension of the return date were obtained and include the missing items noted above and a of this copy ruling.

PMC JEW MRT

T QF PE L, FIRST CIRCUIT f

DE U Y CL RK OF COURT FOR THE COURT

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re J.E.T.
211 So. 3d 575 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2016)
O'Bannon v. Moriah Techs., Inc.
248 So. 3d 392 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
State Of Louisiana v. Henry McMillan, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-louisiana-v-henry-mcmillan-lactapp-2021.