State of Louisiana v. Donald Broussard

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedJune 12, 2020
DocketKA-0019-0792
StatusUnknown

This text of State of Louisiana v. Donald Broussard (State of Louisiana v. Donald Broussard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State of Louisiana v. Donald Broussard, (La. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT

19-792

VERSUS

DONALD BROUSSARD

************ APPEAL FROM SIXTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF IBERIA, NO. 17-284 HONORABLE CURTIS SIGUR, DISTRICT JUDGE

************ SYLVIA R. COOKS JUDGE ************

Court composed of Sylvia R. Cooks, Phyllis M. Keaty and Van H. Kyzar, Judges. REVERSED. REMANDED FOR A NEW TRIAL.

Pride J. Doran Dwazendra J. Smith Doran and Cawthorne 521 East Landry Street Opelousas, LA 70571 (337) 948-8008 Attorneys for Defendant/Appellant: Donald Broussard

Hon. M. Bofill Duhe´ District Attorney, Sixteenth Judicial District Janet M. Perrodin, Assistant District Attorney W. Claire Howington, Assistant District Attorney 300 Iberia Street, Suite 200 New Iberia, LA 70560 (337) 369-4420 Attorneys for Appellee: State of Louisiana COOKS, Judge.

The record in this case shows the jury was polled and returned a verdict of

guilty of negligent homicide, a violation of La.R.S. 14:32, by a vote of eleven to one.

The United States Supreme Court recently held non-unanimous jury verdicts

unconstitutional. Ramos v. Louisiana, 2020 WL 1906545, 590 U.S. ___, ___ S.Ct.

___ (2020). (Slip Op.). The Supreme Court unambiguously determined that non-

unanimous verdicts are not permissible under the Sixth Amendment to the

Constitution and the prohibition applies to the states through the Fourteenth

Amendment. (Slip Op. at p. 26; see also concurrences by Sotomayor, Kavanaugh,

and Thomas, JJ.).1

Further, the opinion recognizes, that its ruling applies to cases pending on

direct review. (Slip Op. at 22-23.) Justice Kavanaugh’s concurrence states this

explicitly. (Slip Op. at 15-17.) Such review is in keeping with this state’s

jurisprudence. See, State v. Ruiz, 06-1755 (La. 4/11/07), 955 So.2d 81. We therefore

find the Ramos ruling is applicable and it requires Defendant’s conviction by a non-

unanimous jury verdict be reversed. Accordingly, the case must be remanded for a

new trial.

REVERSED. REMANDED FOR A NEW TRIAL.

1 Each concurrence has its own sequence of page numbers.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Ruiz
955 So. 2d 81 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
State of Louisiana v. Donald Broussard, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-louisiana-v-donald-broussard-lactapp-2020.