State of Louisiana v. Corlious C. Dyson
This text of State of Louisiana v. Corlious C. Dyson (State of Louisiana v. Corlious C. Dyson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT
17-21
STATE OF LOUISIANA
VERSUS
CORLIOUS C. DYSON
AKA CORLIOUS CORALL DYSON
**********
APPEAL FROM THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF LAFAYETTE, NO. CR 140554 HONORABLE EDWARD D. RUBIN, DISTRICT JUDGE, ON REMAND FROM THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT
SHANNON J. GREMILLION JUDGE
Court composed of Shannon J. Gremillion, John E. Conery, and Candyce G. Perret, Judges.
CONVICTION VACATED. REMANDED. Hon. Keith A. Stutes Fifteenth Judicial District Attorney Cynthia K. Simon Assistant District Attorney P. O. Box 3306 Lafayette, LA 70502-3306 (337) 232-5170 COUNSEL FOR APPELLEE: State of Louisiana
Chad M. Ikerd Louisiana Appellate Project P.O.Box 2125 Lafayette, LA 70502 (225) 806-2930 COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT/APPELLANT: Corlious C. Dyson GREMILLION, Judge.
Defendant, Corlious C. Dyson, was indicted for the August 26, 2012 second
degree murder of Clement Amos. Mr. Dyson’s jury trial commenced on November
17, 2015, and on November 20, 2015, the jury returned a non-unanimous verdict of
guilty of second degree murder. The trial court sentenced Defendant to life
imprisonment without the benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence.
Following the pronouncement of the sentence, Defendant filed a “Motion for
Reconsideration of Sentence.” The trial court denied the motion in open court.
Defendant perfected an appeal and asserted that the evidence was insufficient
to support his conviction. We affirmed Defendant’s conviction and sentence. State
v. Dyson, 17-21 (La.App. 3 Cir. 5/17/17), 220 So.3d 785. Defendant sought a writ
of certiorari or review from the Louisiana Supreme Court, which denied his
application. State v. Dyson, 17-1048 (La. 1/14/18), 261 So.3d 784.
Defendant then turned to the United States Supreme Court, which granted
certiorari and remanded the matter to this court on the basis of Ramos v. Louisiana,
590 U.S. ___, 140 S.Ct. 1390 (2019), which invalidated non-unanimous jury
convictions in serious cases. Dyson v. Louisiana, ___U.S. ___, 140 S.Ct. 2710
(2020). In light of Ramos, we vacate Defendant’s conviction and remand to the trial
court for a new trial.
CONVICTION VACATED. REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State of Louisiana v. Corlious C. Dyson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-louisiana-v-corlious-c-dyson-lactapp-2021.